An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Pain disrupts attention in order to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions which rely on attention. In the current paper we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on three measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In Experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant’s pain threshold. In Experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a VAS scale (whichever was higher). In Experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low intensity pain, and high intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the three studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.
LanguageEnglish
JournalPain
Early online date11 Jan 2019
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Jan 2019

Cite this

An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning. / Attridge, Nina; Keogh, Edmund; Eccleston, Christopher.

In: Pain, 11.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3999e8e0cb3417991e9b139a20a663f,
title = "An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning",
abstract = "Pain disrupts attention in order to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions which rely on attention. In the current paper we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on three measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In Experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant’s pain threshold. In Experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a VAS scale (whichever was higher). In Experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low intensity pain, and high intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the three studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.",
author = "Nina Attridge and Edmund Keogh and Christopher Eccleston",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001490",
language = "English",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning

AU - Attridge, Nina

AU - Keogh, Edmund

AU - Eccleston, Christopher

PY - 2019/1/11

Y1 - 2019/1/11

N2 - Pain disrupts attention in order to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions which rely on attention. In the current paper we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on three measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In Experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant’s pain threshold. In Experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a VAS scale (whichever was higher). In Experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low intensity pain, and high intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the three studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.

AB - Pain disrupts attention in order to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions which rely on attention. In the current paper we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on three measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In Experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant’s pain threshold. In Experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a VAS scale (whichever was higher). In Experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low intensity pain, and high intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the three studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.

U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001490

DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001490

M3 - Article

JO - Pain

T2 - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

ER -