An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Pain disrupts attention to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions, which rely on attention. In the current article, we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on 3 measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant's pain threshold. In experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a visual analogue scale (whichever was higher). In experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low-intensity pain, and high-intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the 3 studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1093-1102
Number of pages10
JournalPain
Volume160
Issue number5
Early online date11 Jan 2019
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 May 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning. / Attridge, Nina; Keogh, Edmund; Eccleston, Christopher.

In: Pain, Vol. 160, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 1093-1102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3999e8e0cb3417991e9b139a20a663f,
title = "An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning",
abstract = "Pain disrupts attention to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions, which rely on attention. In the current article, we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on 3 measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant's pain threshold. In experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a visual analogue scale (whichever was higher). In experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low-intensity pain, and high-intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the 3 studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.",
author = "Nina Attridge and Edmund Keogh and Christopher Eccleston",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001490",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "1093--1102",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of the effect of experimental pain on logical reasoning

AU - Attridge, Nina

AU - Keogh, Edmund

AU - Eccleston, Christopher

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Pain disrupts attention to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions, which rely on attention. In the current article, we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on 3 measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant's pain threshold. In experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a visual analogue scale (whichever was higher). In experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low-intensity pain, and high-intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the 3 studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.

AB - Pain disrupts attention to prioritise avoidance of harm and promote analgesic behaviour. This could in turn have negative effects on higher-level cognitions, which rely on attention. In the current article, we examined the effect of thermal pain induction on 3 measures of reasoning: the Cognitive Reflection Test, Belief Bias Syllogisms task, and Conditional Inference task. In experiment 1, the thermal pain was set at each participant's pain threshold. In experiment 2, it was set to a minimum of 44°C or 7/10 on a visual analogue scale (whichever was higher). In experiment 3, performance was compared in no pain, low-intensity pain, and high-intensity pain conditions. We predicted that the experience of pain would reduce correct responding on the reasoning tasks. However, this was not supported in any of the 3 studies. We discuss possible interpretations of our failure to reject the null hypothesis and the importance of publishing null results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065100613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001490

DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001490

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 1093

EP - 1102

JO - Pain

T2 - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 5

ER -