An investigation of constructions of justice and injustice in chronic pain: a Q-methodology approach

J McParland, L Hezseltine, M Serpell, Christopher Eccleston, P Stenner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study used Q-methodology to explore justice-related accounts of chronic pain. Eighty participants completed the Q-sorting procedure (33 chronic pain sufferers and 47 non-pain sufferers). Analysis revealed five main factors. Three factors blame: society for poor medical and interpersonal treatment; the chronic pain sufferer for indulging in self-pity and unempathic healthcare workers for ignoring patients. A fourth factor acknowledges the unfairness of pain and encourages self-reliance. The fifth factor rejects injustice in the chronic pain discourse. Overall, there is a shared view that chronic pain brings unfair treatment, disrespect and a de-legitimization of pain. Future research ideas are suggested.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-883
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Chronic Pain
Pain
Medical Societies
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • justice
  • chronic pain
  • injustice
  • Q-methodology

Cite this

An investigation of constructions of justice and injustice in chronic pain: a Q-methodology approach. / McParland, J; Hezseltine, L; Serpell, M; Eccleston, Christopher; Stenner, P.

In: Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 6, 09.2011, p. 873-883.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{afb1f4428b2e49cdaf39b447a639a799,
title = "An investigation of constructions of justice and injustice in chronic pain: a Q-methodology approach",
abstract = "This study used Q-methodology to explore justice-related accounts of chronic pain. Eighty participants completed the Q-sorting procedure (33 chronic pain sufferers and 47 non-pain sufferers). Analysis revealed five main factors. Three factors blame: society for poor medical and interpersonal treatment; the chronic pain sufferer for indulging in self-pity and unempathic healthcare workers for ignoring patients. A fourth factor acknowledges the unfairness of pain and encourages self-reliance. The fifth factor rejects injustice in the chronic pain discourse. Overall, there is a shared view that chronic pain brings unfair treatment, disrespect and a de-legitimization of pain. Future research ideas are suggested.",
keywords = "justice, chronic pain, injustice, Q-methodology",
author = "J McParland and L Hezseltine and M Serpell and Christopher Eccleston and P Stenner",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/1359105310392417",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "873--883",
journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",
issn = "1359-1053",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of constructions of justice and injustice in chronic pain: a Q-methodology approach

AU - McParland, J

AU - Hezseltine, L

AU - Serpell, M

AU - Eccleston, Christopher

AU - Stenner, P

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - This study used Q-methodology to explore justice-related accounts of chronic pain. Eighty participants completed the Q-sorting procedure (33 chronic pain sufferers and 47 non-pain sufferers). Analysis revealed five main factors. Three factors blame: society for poor medical and interpersonal treatment; the chronic pain sufferer for indulging in self-pity and unempathic healthcare workers for ignoring patients. A fourth factor acknowledges the unfairness of pain and encourages self-reliance. The fifth factor rejects injustice in the chronic pain discourse. Overall, there is a shared view that chronic pain brings unfair treatment, disrespect and a de-legitimization of pain. Future research ideas are suggested.

AB - This study used Q-methodology to explore justice-related accounts of chronic pain. Eighty participants completed the Q-sorting procedure (33 chronic pain sufferers and 47 non-pain sufferers). Analysis revealed five main factors. Three factors blame: society for poor medical and interpersonal treatment; the chronic pain sufferer for indulging in self-pity and unempathic healthcare workers for ignoring patients. A fourth factor acknowledges the unfairness of pain and encourages self-reliance. The fifth factor rejects injustice in the chronic pain discourse. Overall, there is a shared view that chronic pain brings unfair treatment, disrespect and a de-legitimization of pain. Future research ideas are suggested.

KW - justice

KW - chronic pain

KW - injustice

KW - Q-methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052299082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105310392417

U2 - 10.1177/1359105310392417

DO - 10.1177/1359105310392417

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 873

EP - 883

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

SN - 1359-1053

IS - 6

ER -