An experimental investigation of the impact of personality disorder diagnosis on clinicians

can we see past the borderline?

Danny C. K. Lam, Elena V. Poplavskaya, Paul M. Salkovskis, Lorna I. Hogg, Holly Panting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
180 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: There is concern that diagnostic labels for psychiatric disorders may invoke damaging stigma, stereotypes and misunderstanding. Aims: This study investigated clinicians’ reactions to diagnostic labelling by examining their positive and negative reactions to the label borderline personality disorder (BPD). Method: Mental health professionals (n=265) viewed a videotape of a patient suffering from panic disorder and agoraphobia undergoing assessment. Prior to viewing the videotape, participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions and were given the following information about the patient: (a) general background information; (b) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD; and (c) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD, but explicitly adding BPD as a possible comorbid diagnostic label. All participants were then asked to note things they had seen in the videotape which made them feel optimistic and pessimistic about treatment outcome. Results: Participants in the group that were explicitly informed that the patient had a BPD diagnostic label reported significantly fewer reasons to be optimistic than the other two groups. Conclusions: Diagnostic labels may negatively impact on clinicians’ judgments and perceptions of individuals and therefore clinicians should think carefully about whether, and how, they use diagnosis and efforts should be made to de-stigmatise diagnostic terms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-373
JournalBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Volume44
Issue number3
Early online date25 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Fingerprint

Borderline Personality Disorder
Personality Disorders
Videotape Recording
Agoraphobia
Panic Disorder
Psychiatry
Mental Health

Keywords

  • borderline personality disorder, panic disorder, diagnosis

Cite this

An experimental investigation of the impact of personality disorder diagnosis on clinicians : can we see past the borderline? / Lam, Danny C. K.; Poplavskaya, Elena V.; Salkovskis, Paul M.; Hogg, Lorna I.; Panting, Holly.

In: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Vol. 44, No. 3, 05.2016, p. 361-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e368a438afa4ec1b97a73758b9fc4fd,
title = "An experimental investigation of the impact of personality disorder diagnosis on clinicians: can we see past the borderline?",
abstract = "Background: There is concern that diagnostic labels for psychiatric disorders may invoke damaging stigma, stereotypes and misunderstanding. Aims: This study investigated clinicians’ reactions to diagnostic labelling by examining their positive and negative reactions to the label borderline personality disorder (BPD). Method: Mental health professionals (n=265) viewed a videotape of a patient suffering from panic disorder and agoraphobia undergoing assessment. Prior to viewing the videotape, participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions and were given the following information about the patient: (a) general background information; (b) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD; and (c) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD, but explicitly adding BPD as a possible comorbid diagnostic label. All participants were then asked to note things they had seen in the videotape which made them feel optimistic and pessimistic about treatment outcome. Results: Participants in the group that were explicitly informed that the patient had a BPD diagnostic label reported significantly fewer reasons to be optimistic than the other two groups. Conclusions: Diagnostic labels may negatively impact on clinicians’ judgments and perceptions of individuals and therefore clinicians should think carefully about whether, and how, they use diagnosis and efforts should be made to de-stigmatise diagnostic terms.",
keywords = "borderline personality disorder, panic disorder, diagnosis",
author = "Lam, {Danny C. K.} and Poplavskaya, {Elena V.} and Salkovskis, {Paul M.} and Hogg, {Lorna I.} and Holly Panting",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1017/S1352465815000351",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "361--373",
journal = "Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy",
issn = "1352-4658",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An experimental investigation of the impact of personality disorder diagnosis on clinicians

T2 - can we see past the borderline?

AU - Lam, Danny C. K.

AU - Poplavskaya, Elena V.

AU - Salkovskis, Paul M.

AU - Hogg, Lorna I.

AU - Panting, Holly

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

N2 - Background: There is concern that diagnostic labels for psychiatric disorders may invoke damaging stigma, stereotypes and misunderstanding. Aims: This study investigated clinicians’ reactions to diagnostic labelling by examining their positive and negative reactions to the label borderline personality disorder (BPD). Method: Mental health professionals (n=265) viewed a videotape of a patient suffering from panic disorder and agoraphobia undergoing assessment. Prior to viewing the videotape, participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions and were given the following information about the patient: (a) general background information; (b) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD; and (c) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD, but explicitly adding BPD as a possible comorbid diagnostic label. All participants were then asked to note things they had seen in the videotape which made them feel optimistic and pessimistic about treatment outcome. Results: Participants in the group that were explicitly informed that the patient had a BPD diagnostic label reported significantly fewer reasons to be optimistic than the other two groups. Conclusions: Diagnostic labels may negatively impact on clinicians’ judgments and perceptions of individuals and therefore clinicians should think carefully about whether, and how, they use diagnosis and efforts should be made to de-stigmatise diagnostic terms.

AB - Background: There is concern that diagnostic labels for psychiatric disorders may invoke damaging stigma, stereotypes and misunderstanding. Aims: This study investigated clinicians’ reactions to diagnostic labelling by examining their positive and negative reactions to the label borderline personality disorder (BPD). Method: Mental health professionals (n=265) viewed a videotape of a patient suffering from panic disorder and agoraphobia undergoing assessment. Prior to viewing the videotape, participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions and were given the following information about the patient: (a) general background information; (b) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD; and (c) additional descriptive information about behaviour corresponding to BPD, but explicitly adding BPD as a possible comorbid diagnostic label. All participants were then asked to note things they had seen in the videotape which made them feel optimistic and pessimistic about treatment outcome. Results: Participants in the group that were explicitly informed that the patient had a BPD diagnostic label reported significantly fewer reasons to be optimistic than the other two groups. Conclusions: Diagnostic labels may negatively impact on clinicians’ judgments and perceptions of individuals and therefore clinicians should think carefully about whether, and how, they use diagnosis and efforts should be made to de-stigmatise diagnostic terms.

KW - borderline personality disorder, panic disorder, diagnosis

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465815000351

U2 - 10.1017/S1352465815000351

DO - 10.1017/S1352465815000351

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 361

EP - 373

JO - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

JF - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

SN - 1352-4658

IS - 3

ER -