An Experimental Investigation into the Effect of State-Anxiety on State-Paranoia in People Experiencing Psychosis

Megan Cowles, Lorna Hogg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: There is strong evidence to suggest that anxiety is associated with paranoia in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, no research to date has directly manipulated anxiety to investigate if state-Anxiety has a causal role in state-paranoia in clinical populations. Aims: To investigate whether an anxious-mood induction leads to greater paranoia than a neutral-mood induction in people experiencing psychosis and paranoia and, if so, whether this is predicted by anxiety over and above other variables. Method: 22 participants with a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis took part in a two condition cross-over experimental design. Participants underwent a neutral-mood and an anxious-mood induction with levels of state-Anxiety, state-Affect and state-paranoia being measured before and after each condition. Results: State-paranoia was significantly higher after the anxious condition compared with the neutral condition. State-Anxiety and negative-Affect were significant predictors of levels of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. When both predictors were included in a regression model, only negative-Affect was a significant predictor of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. There were a number of methodological limitations. Conclusions: State-Anxiety and negative-Affect may both be involved in the maintenance of paranoia in clinical populations, as predicted by cognitive models. Negative-Affect may be the strongest predictor of state-paranoia in clinical populations. Reasons for this are discussed, as well as the implications. Interventions that seek to reduce negative state-Affect may be beneficial in managing state-paranoia. Further research is warranted to explore the suggested clinical and theoretical implications of these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-66
Number of pages15
JournalBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Volume47
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • affect
  • anxiety
  • paranoia
  • psychosis
  • schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

An Experimental Investigation into the Effect of State-Anxiety on State-Paranoia in People Experiencing Psychosis. / Cowles, Megan; Hogg, Lorna.

In: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 52-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6df353d94b744b899834a1318354abb9,
title = "An Experimental Investigation into the Effect of State-Anxiety on State-Paranoia in People Experiencing Psychosis",
abstract = "Background: There is strong evidence to suggest that anxiety is associated with paranoia in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, no research to date has directly manipulated anxiety to investigate if state-Anxiety has a causal role in state-paranoia in clinical populations. Aims: To investigate whether an anxious-mood induction leads to greater paranoia than a neutral-mood induction in people experiencing psychosis and paranoia and, if so, whether this is predicted by anxiety over and above other variables. Method: 22 participants with a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis took part in a two condition cross-over experimental design. Participants underwent a neutral-mood and an anxious-mood induction with levels of state-Anxiety, state-Affect and state-paranoia being measured before and after each condition. Results: State-paranoia was significantly higher after the anxious condition compared with the neutral condition. State-Anxiety and negative-Affect were significant predictors of levels of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. When both predictors were included in a regression model, only negative-Affect was a significant predictor of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. There were a number of methodological limitations. Conclusions: State-Anxiety and negative-Affect may both be involved in the maintenance of paranoia in clinical populations, as predicted by cognitive models. Negative-Affect may be the strongest predictor of state-paranoia in clinical populations. Reasons for this are discussed, as well as the implications. Interventions that seek to reduce negative state-Affect may be beneficial in managing state-paranoia. Further research is warranted to explore the suggested clinical and theoretical implications of these findings.",
keywords = "affect, anxiety, paranoia, psychosis, schizophrenia",
author = "Megan Cowles and Lorna Hogg",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1352465818000401",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "52--66",
journal = "Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy",
issn = "1352-4658",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Experimental Investigation into the Effect of State-Anxiety on State-Paranoia in People Experiencing Psychosis

AU - Cowles, Megan

AU - Hogg, Lorna

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: There is strong evidence to suggest that anxiety is associated with paranoia in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, no research to date has directly manipulated anxiety to investigate if state-Anxiety has a causal role in state-paranoia in clinical populations. Aims: To investigate whether an anxious-mood induction leads to greater paranoia than a neutral-mood induction in people experiencing psychosis and paranoia and, if so, whether this is predicted by anxiety over and above other variables. Method: 22 participants with a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis took part in a two condition cross-over experimental design. Participants underwent a neutral-mood and an anxious-mood induction with levels of state-Anxiety, state-Affect and state-paranoia being measured before and after each condition. Results: State-paranoia was significantly higher after the anxious condition compared with the neutral condition. State-Anxiety and negative-Affect were significant predictors of levels of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. When both predictors were included in a regression model, only negative-Affect was a significant predictor of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. There were a number of methodological limitations. Conclusions: State-Anxiety and negative-Affect may both be involved in the maintenance of paranoia in clinical populations, as predicted by cognitive models. Negative-Affect may be the strongest predictor of state-paranoia in clinical populations. Reasons for this are discussed, as well as the implications. Interventions that seek to reduce negative state-Affect may be beneficial in managing state-paranoia. Further research is warranted to explore the suggested clinical and theoretical implications of these findings.

AB - Background: There is strong evidence to suggest that anxiety is associated with paranoia in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, no research to date has directly manipulated anxiety to investigate if state-Anxiety has a causal role in state-paranoia in clinical populations. Aims: To investigate whether an anxious-mood induction leads to greater paranoia than a neutral-mood induction in people experiencing psychosis and paranoia and, if so, whether this is predicted by anxiety over and above other variables. Method: 22 participants with a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis took part in a two condition cross-over experimental design. Participants underwent a neutral-mood and an anxious-mood induction with levels of state-Anxiety, state-Affect and state-paranoia being measured before and after each condition. Results: State-paranoia was significantly higher after the anxious condition compared with the neutral condition. State-Anxiety and negative-Affect were significant predictors of levels of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. When both predictors were included in a regression model, only negative-Affect was a significant predictor of state-paranoia after the anxious condition. There were a number of methodological limitations. Conclusions: State-Anxiety and negative-Affect may both be involved in the maintenance of paranoia in clinical populations, as predicted by cognitive models. Negative-Affect may be the strongest predictor of state-paranoia in clinical populations. Reasons for this are discussed, as well as the implications. Interventions that seek to reduce negative state-Affect may be beneficial in managing state-paranoia. Further research is warranted to explore the suggested clinical and theoretical implications of these findings.

KW - affect

KW - anxiety

KW - paranoia

KW - psychosis

KW - schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048954934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1352465818000401

DO - 10.1017/S1352465818000401

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 52

EP - 66

JO - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

JF - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

SN - 1352-4658

IS - 1

ER -