An empirical study of nonlinear adjustment in the UIP model using a smooth transition regression (STR) model

Dandan Li, A Ghoshray, B Morley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This study considers the nonlinear relationship between the expected exchange rate change and the interest rate differential, using STR models (ESTR and LSTR), with Sharpe ratios, interest rate differentials and exchange rate volatilities as the transition variables. The results generally conclude that UIP holds with the larger Sharpe ratio and higher exchange rate volatility regimes, which is consistent with the transaction costs and limits to speculation hypotheses. However, the interest rate differential (which is generally not used much as a transition variable) when used in this study results in a failure to support UIP in the upper regime, which suggests it is the risk not the pure return that determines the transition.
LanguageEnglish
Pages109-120
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Review of Financial Analysis
Volume30
DOIs
StatusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Empirical study
Smooth transition regression
Interest rate differentials
Regression model
Nonlinear adjustment
Sharpe ratio
Exchange rate volatility
Nonlinear relationships
Exchange rates
Transaction costs
Speculation

Cite this

An empirical study of nonlinear adjustment in the UIP model using a smooth transition regression (STR) model. / Li, Dandan; Ghoshray, A; Morley, B.

In: International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 30, 12.2013, p. 109-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7e4812f086b4134b829e5411f476569,
title = "An empirical study of nonlinear adjustment in the UIP model using a smooth transition regression (STR) model",
abstract = "This study considers the nonlinear relationship between the expected exchange rate change and the interest rate differential, using STR models (ESTR and LSTR), with Sharpe ratios, interest rate differentials and exchange rate volatilities as the transition variables. The results generally conclude that UIP holds with the larger Sharpe ratio and higher exchange rate volatility regimes, which is consistent with the transaction costs and limits to speculation hypotheses. However, the interest rate differential (which is generally not used much as a transition variable) when used in this study results in a failure to support UIP in the upper regime, which suggests it is the risk not the pure return that determines the transition.",
author = "Dandan Li and A Ghoshray and B Morley",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.012",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "109--120",
journal = "International Review of Financial Analysis",
issn = "1057-5219",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical study of nonlinear adjustment in the UIP model using a smooth transition regression (STR) model

AU - Li,Dandan

AU - Ghoshray,A

AU - Morley,B

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - This study considers the nonlinear relationship between the expected exchange rate change and the interest rate differential, using STR models (ESTR and LSTR), with Sharpe ratios, interest rate differentials and exchange rate volatilities as the transition variables. The results generally conclude that UIP holds with the larger Sharpe ratio and higher exchange rate volatility regimes, which is consistent with the transaction costs and limits to speculation hypotheses. However, the interest rate differential (which is generally not used much as a transition variable) when used in this study results in a failure to support UIP in the upper regime, which suggests it is the risk not the pure return that determines the transition.

AB - This study considers the nonlinear relationship between the expected exchange rate change and the interest rate differential, using STR models (ESTR and LSTR), with Sharpe ratios, interest rate differentials and exchange rate volatilities as the transition variables. The results generally conclude that UIP holds with the larger Sharpe ratio and higher exchange rate volatility regimes, which is consistent with the transaction costs and limits to speculation hypotheses. However, the interest rate differential (which is generally not used much as a transition variable) when used in this study results in a failure to support UIP in the upper regime, which suggests it is the risk not the pure return that determines the transition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881246823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.012

U2 - 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.012

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 109

EP - 120

JO - International Review of Financial Analysis

T2 - International Review of Financial Analysis

JF - International Review of Financial Analysis

SN - 1057-5219

ER -