Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An Agenda for Open Science in Communication

  • Tobias Dienlin
  • , Niklas Johannes
  • , Nicholas David Bowman
  • , Philipp K Masur
  • , Sven Engesser
  • , Anna Sophie Kümpel
  • , Josephine Lukito
  • , Lindsey M Bier
  • , Renwen Zhang
  • , Benjamin K Johnson
  • , Richard Huskey
  • , Frank M Schneider
  • , Johannes Breuer
  • , Douglas A Parry
  • , Ivar Vermeulen
  • , Jaime Banks
  • , René Weber
  • , David A Ellis
  • , Tim Smits
  • , James D Ivory
  • Sabine Trepte, Bree Mcewan, Eike Mark Rinke, German Neubaum, Stephan Winter, Christopher J Carpenter, Nicole Krämer, Sonja Utz, Julian Unkel, Xiaohui Wang, Brittany I Davidson, Nuri Kim, Andrea Stevenson Won, Emese Domahidi, Neil A Lewis, Claes De Vreese
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Texas Tech University at Lubbock
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Southern California
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Florida
  • University of California Davis
  • University of Mannheim
  • GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences Cologne
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Institute for Media Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Virginia Tech
  • DePaul University
  • University of Leeds
  • Universitat Duisburg-Essen
  • University of Koblenz‐Landau
  • Western Illinois University
  • Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien
  • Hong Kong Baptist University
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Cornell University
  • Technische Universität Ilmenau
  • University of Amsterdam
  • University of Tübingen
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of California Santa Barbara
  • University of Hohenheim
  • University of Bristol

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

175   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)
109 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called “replication crisis” has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume71
Issue number1
Early online date17 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Journal of Communication 71 (2021) 1–26 VC The Author(s) 2020.

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Open Science
  • Preregistration
  • Registered Reports
  • Replicability
  • Reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Agenda for Open Science in Communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this