Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Alternatives to antibiotics - a pipeline portfolio review

  • Lloyd Czaplewski
  • , Richard Bax
  • , Martha Clokie
  • , Mike Dawson
  • , Heather Fairhead
  • , Vincent A Fischetti
  • , Simon Foster
  • , Brendan F Gilmore
  • , Robert E W Hancock
  • , David Harper
  • , Ian R Henderson
  • , Kai Hilpert
  • , Brian V Jones
  • , Aras Kadioglu
  • , David Knowles
  • , Sigríður Ólafsdóttir
  • , David Payne
  • , Steve Projan
  • , Sunil Shaunak
  • , Jared Silverman
  • Christopher M Thomas, Trevor J Trust, Peter Warn, John H Rex
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • University of Birmingham
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Imperial College London
  • Pan-Provincial Vaccine Enterprise
  • Evotec (UK) Ltd
  • AstraZeneca
  • Chemical Biology Ventures Ltd
  • Abgentis Ltd
  • University of Leicester
  • Novacta Biosystems
  • Rockefeller University
  • University of British Columbia
  • TranScrip Partners LLP
  • Phico Therapeutics
  • University of Sheffield
  • Evolution Biotechnologies
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • TiKa Diagnostics Ltd
  • University of Brighton
  • University of Liverpool
  • Absynth Biologics
  • Icelandic Medicines Agency
  • Kaleido Biosciences
  • MedImmune
  • F2G Ltd

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

744   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Antibiotics have saved countless lives and enabled the development of modern medicine over the past 70 years. However, it is clear that the success of antibiotics might only have been temporary and we now expect a long-term and perhaps never-ending challenge to find new therapies to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. A broader approach to address bacterial infection is needed. In this Review, we discuss alternatives to antibiotics, which we defined as non-compound approaches (products other than classic antibacterial agents) that target bacteria or any approaches that target the host. The most advanced approaches are antibodies, probiotics, and vaccines in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. This first wave of alternatives to antibiotics will probably best serve as adjunctive or preventive therapies, which suggests that conventional antibiotics are still needed. Funding of more than £1·5 billion is needed over 10 years to test and develop these alternatives to antibiotics. Investment needs to be partnered with translational expertise and targeted to support the validation of these approaches in phase 2 trials, which would be a catalyst for active engagement and investment by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Only a sustained, concerted, and coordinated international effort will provide the solutions needed for the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-51
Number of pages13
JournalThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Jan 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
  • Bacteria/drug effects
  • Bacterial Infections/drug therapy
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects
  • Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Vaccines/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alternatives to antibiotics - a pipeline portfolio review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this