TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternatives to antibiotics - a pipeline portfolio review
AU - Czaplewski, Lloyd
AU - Bax, Richard
AU - Clokie, Martha
AU - Dawson, Mike
AU - Fairhead, Heather
AU - Fischetti, Vincent A
AU - Foster, Simon
AU - Gilmore, Brendan F
AU - Hancock, Robert E W
AU - Harper, David
AU - Henderson, Ian R
AU - Hilpert, Kai
AU - Jones, Brian V
AU - Kadioglu, Aras
AU - Knowles, David
AU - Ólafsdóttir, Sigríður
AU - Payne, David
AU - Projan, Steve
AU - Shaunak, Sunil
AU - Silverman, Jared
AU - Thomas, Christopher M
AU - Trust, Trevor J
AU - Warn, Peter
AU - Rex, John H
N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/1/13
Y1 - 2016/1/13
N2 - Antibiotics have saved countless lives and enabled the development of modern medicine over the past 70 years. However, it is clear that the success of antibiotics might only have been temporary and we now expect a long-term and perhaps never-ending challenge to find new therapies to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. A broader approach to address bacterial infection is needed. In this Review, we discuss alternatives to antibiotics, which we defined as non-compound approaches (products other than classic antibacterial agents) that target bacteria or any approaches that target the host. The most advanced approaches are antibodies, probiotics, and vaccines in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. This first wave of alternatives to antibiotics will probably best serve as adjunctive or preventive therapies, which suggests that conventional antibiotics are still needed. Funding of more than £1·5 billion is needed over 10 years to test and develop these alternatives to antibiotics. Investment needs to be partnered with translational expertise and targeted to support the validation of these approaches in phase 2 trials, which would be a catalyst for active engagement and investment by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Only a sustained, concerted, and coordinated international effort will provide the solutions needed for the future.
AB - Antibiotics have saved countless lives and enabled the development of modern medicine over the past 70 years. However, it is clear that the success of antibiotics might only have been temporary and we now expect a long-term and perhaps never-ending challenge to find new therapies to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. A broader approach to address bacterial infection is needed. In this Review, we discuss alternatives to antibiotics, which we defined as non-compound approaches (products other than classic antibacterial agents) that target bacteria or any approaches that target the host. The most advanced approaches are antibodies, probiotics, and vaccines in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. This first wave of alternatives to antibiotics will probably best serve as adjunctive or preventive therapies, which suggests that conventional antibiotics are still needed. Funding of more than £1·5 billion is needed over 10 years to test and develop these alternatives to antibiotics. Investment needs to be partnered with translational expertise and targeted to support the validation of these approaches in phase 2 trials, which would be a catalyst for active engagement and investment by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Only a sustained, concerted, and coordinated international effort will provide the solutions needed for the future.
KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Bacteria/drug effects
KW - Bacterial Infections/drug therapy
KW - Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects
KW - Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Vaccines/therapeutic use
U2 - 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00466-1
DO - 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00466-1
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26795692
SN - 1473-3099
VL - 16
SP - 239
EP - 251
JO - The Lancet Infectious Diseases
JF - The Lancet Infectious Diseases
IS - 2
ER -