All for one and one for all, except when it comes to NATO

David J. Galbreath

All for one and one for all, except when it comes to NATO

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

Abstract

The majority of people in the UK and most other European members of NATO say they no longer support the key principle of the alliance: namely that an armed attack on one must be regarded as an attack on all.

Original language	English
Specialist publication	The Conversation
Publication status	Published - 12 Jun 2015

Access to Document

https://theconversation.com/all-for-one-and-one-for-all-except-when-it-comes-to-nato-43139Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@misc{0825e5e941c3428eb5e07e090e20a185,

title = "All for one and one for all, except when it comes to NATO",

abstract = "The majority of people in the UK and most other European members of NATO say they no longer support the key principle of the alliance: namely that an armed attack on one must be regarded as an attack on all. ",

author = "Galbreath, {David J.}",

year = "2015",

month = jun,

day = "12",

language = "English",

journal = "The Conversation",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - All for one and one for all, except when it comes to NATO

AU - Galbreath, David J.

PY - 2015/6/12

Y1 - 2015/6/12

N2 - The majority of people in the UK and most other European members of NATO say they no longer support the key principle of the alliance: namely that an armed attack on one must be regarded as an attack on all.

AB - The majority of people in the UK and most other European members of NATO say they no longer support the key principle of the alliance: namely that an armed attack on one must be regarded as an attack on all.

UR - https://theconversation.com/all-for-one-and-one-for-all-except-when-it-comes-to-nato-43139

M3 - Article

JO - The Conversation

JF - The Conversation

ER -

All for one and one for all, except when it comes to NATO

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this