Air injection LTO process: an IOR technique for light-oil reservoirs

S R Ren, M Greaves, R R Rathbone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 79 Citations

Abstract

The paper describes an air injection improved oil recovery (IOR) process for the recovery of residual oil from light-oil reservoirs. Unlike the air injection technique applied in heavy-oil reservoirs, the main concern for a light-oil reservoir is to remove the oxygen from the injected air by some kind of spontaneous reaction between the oil and oxygen. In-situ combustion in heavy oil reservoirs is a very effective reaction pathway to achieve complete oxygen consumption, as well as to generate heat for enhanced oil recovery. For deep light-oil reservoirs, in-situ combustion is not necessary and may not be readily sustained. More likely, so-called low temp. oxidn. (LTO) will prevail. In this study, the potential for LTO reactions to consume oxygen, the reaction rate, and the reaction pathways are investigated. A simplified LTO reaction model has been established based on exptl. data obtained from a batch reactor expt. The model was validated against high-pressure flow displacement expts. in an oxidn. tube. A scoping simulation study on a reservoir scale has enabled a sensitivity assessment of the process to be made. The effect of air injection rate, reservoir dip, oil viscosity, formation permeability, numerical grid size, and reservoir temp. on oil recovery and the thermal effect were investigated. Compared with what is normally understood to be conventional air injection (in-situ combustion), the air injection LTO process is flexible in terms of injection rate, stable because of spontaneous reaction (if the reservoir temp. is high enough), and also an economic alternative to hydrocarbon, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide gas. It can also be used as a secondary recovery method in reservoirs that are not suitable for water injection. [on SciFinder (R)]
LanguageEnglish
Pages90-99
Number of pages10
JournalSPE Journal (Society of Petroleum Engineers)
Volume7
Issue number1
StatusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Recovery
oil
air
Air
In situ combustion
Oxygen
Petroleum reservoirs
combustion
heavy oil
oxygen
Crude oil
Secondary recovery
Oils
Water injection
recovery method
Batch reactors
enhanced oil recovery
nitrogen dioxide
Thermal effects
oxygen consumption

Keywords

  • Petroleum recovery (improved residual oil recovery from light-oil reservoirs using air injection)
  • petroleum recovery air injection oxidn
  • Oxidation (low-temp.
  • improved residual oil recovery from light-oil reservoirs using air injection)

Cite this

Air injection LTO process: an IOR technique for light-oil reservoirs. / Ren, S R; Greaves, M; Rathbone, R R.

In: SPE Journal (Society of Petroleum Engineers), Vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, p. 90-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{62187694ef534cd0a04799314807c878,
title = "Air injection LTO process: an IOR technique for light-oil reservoirs",
abstract = "The paper describes an air injection improved oil recovery (IOR) process for the recovery of residual oil from light-oil reservoirs. Unlike the air injection technique applied in heavy-oil reservoirs, the main concern for a light-oil reservoir is to remove the oxygen from the injected air by some kind of spontaneous reaction between the oil and oxygen. In-situ combustion in heavy oil reservoirs is a very effective reaction pathway to achieve complete oxygen consumption, as well as to generate heat for enhanced oil recovery. For deep light-oil reservoirs, in-situ combustion is not necessary and may not be readily sustained. More likely, so-called low temp. oxidn. (LTO) will prevail. In this study, the potential for LTO reactions to consume oxygen, the reaction rate, and the reaction pathways are investigated. A simplified LTO reaction model has been established based on exptl. data obtained from a batch reactor expt. The model was validated against high-pressure flow displacement expts. in an oxidn. tube. A scoping simulation study on a reservoir scale has enabled a sensitivity assessment of the process to be made. The effect of air injection rate, reservoir dip, oil viscosity, formation permeability, numerical grid size, and reservoir temp. on oil recovery and the thermal effect were investigated. Compared with what is normally understood to be conventional air injection (in-situ combustion), the air injection LTO process is flexible in terms of injection rate, stable because of spontaneous reaction (if the reservoir temp. is high enough), and also an economic alternative to hydrocarbon, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide gas. It can also be used as a secondary recovery method in reservoirs that are not suitable for water injection. [on SciFinder (R)]",
keywords = "Petroleum recovery (improved residual oil recovery from light-oil reservoirs using air injection), petroleum recovery air injection oxidn, Oxidation (low-temp., improved residual oil recovery from light-oil reservoirs using air injection)",
author = "Ren, {S R} and M Greaves and Rathbone, {R R}",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "90--99",
journal = "SPE Journal (Society of Petroleum Engineers)",
issn = "1086-055X",
publisher = "Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Air injection LTO process: an IOR technique for light-oil reservoirs

AU - Ren,S R

AU - Greaves,M

AU - Rathbone,R R

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The paper describes an air injection improved oil recovery (IOR) process for the recovery of residual oil from light-oil reservoirs. Unlike the air injection technique applied in heavy-oil reservoirs, the main concern for a light-oil reservoir is to remove the oxygen from the injected air by some kind of spontaneous reaction between the oil and oxygen. In-situ combustion in heavy oil reservoirs is a very effective reaction pathway to achieve complete oxygen consumption, as well as to generate heat for enhanced oil recovery. For deep light-oil reservoirs, in-situ combustion is not necessary and may not be readily sustained. More likely, so-called low temp. oxidn. (LTO) will prevail. In this study, the potential for LTO reactions to consume oxygen, the reaction rate, and the reaction pathways are investigated. A simplified LTO reaction model has been established based on exptl. data obtained from a batch reactor expt. The model was validated against high-pressure flow displacement expts. in an oxidn. tube. A scoping simulation study on a reservoir scale has enabled a sensitivity assessment of the process to be made. The effect of air injection rate, reservoir dip, oil viscosity, formation permeability, numerical grid size, and reservoir temp. on oil recovery and the thermal effect were investigated. Compared with what is normally understood to be conventional air injection (in-situ combustion), the air injection LTO process is flexible in terms of injection rate, stable because of spontaneous reaction (if the reservoir temp. is high enough), and also an economic alternative to hydrocarbon, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide gas. It can also be used as a secondary recovery method in reservoirs that are not suitable for water injection. [on SciFinder (R)]

AB - The paper describes an air injection improved oil recovery (IOR) process for the recovery of residual oil from light-oil reservoirs. Unlike the air injection technique applied in heavy-oil reservoirs, the main concern for a light-oil reservoir is to remove the oxygen from the injected air by some kind of spontaneous reaction between the oil and oxygen. In-situ combustion in heavy oil reservoirs is a very effective reaction pathway to achieve complete oxygen consumption, as well as to generate heat for enhanced oil recovery. For deep light-oil reservoirs, in-situ combustion is not necessary and may not be readily sustained. More likely, so-called low temp. oxidn. (LTO) will prevail. In this study, the potential for LTO reactions to consume oxygen, the reaction rate, and the reaction pathways are investigated. A simplified LTO reaction model has been established based on exptl. data obtained from a batch reactor expt. The model was validated against high-pressure flow displacement expts. in an oxidn. tube. A scoping simulation study on a reservoir scale has enabled a sensitivity assessment of the process to be made. The effect of air injection rate, reservoir dip, oil viscosity, formation permeability, numerical grid size, and reservoir temp. on oil recovery and the thermal effect were investigated. Compared with what is normally understood to be conventional air injection (in-situ combustion), the air injection LTO process is flexible in terms of injection rate, stable because of spontaneous reaction (if the reservoir temp. is high enough), and also an economic alternative to hydrocarbon, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide gas. It can also be used as a secondary recovery method in reservoirs that are not suitable for water injection. [on SciFinder (R)]

KW - Petroleum recovery (improved residual oil recovery from light-oil reservoirs using air injection)

KW - petroleum recovery air injection oxidn

KW - Oxidation (low-temp.

KW - improved residual oil recovery from light-oil reservoirs using air injection)

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 90

EP - 99

JO - SPE Journal (Society of Petroleum Engineers)

T2 - SPE Journal (Society of Petroleum Engineers)

JF - SPE Journal (Society of Petroleum Engineers)

SN - 1086-055X

IS - 1

ER -