Abstract
Activists and scholars have debated whether “agrarian populisms” premised on multiple classes and groups can pursue progressive objectives if exploiters and exploited are in the same movements. In Pakistan, the militant Pakistan Kissan Ittehad emerged in 2012 by uniting different classes of owner-cultivators who are largely not in direct relations of exploitation with each other. We argue that the PKI nevertheless advances the interests of a “second tier” of rural capitalists, who exploit rural labourers, while underplaying the interests of owner-peasant farmers. This divergence of interests has contributed to the fragmentation of PKI along class and political lines, including attempts by peasant farmers to independently organize around issues particular to them. We suggest that progressive agrarian populism must hinge on the interests of rural labourers and peasant farmers and that second-tier capitalist farmers may be tactical allies as they oppose neoliberal globalization. However, rural labourers and peasants are ideologically and organizationally weak, and thus, the possibility of left-wing agrarian populism requires much legwork.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 85-109 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Journal of Agrarian Change |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 9 Nov 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Jan 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:M. Y. Aftab is thankful to Noaman G. Ali and Sameen Mohsin Ali for their continued support and guidance throughout the completion of this project. N. G. Ali is grateful to Muhammad Nasir, Mustansar Kamran, and Shahzad Ahmad for ongoing discussions about agrarian political economy and rural movements; to Luke Melchiorre and Barbara Harris‐White for their insights; to M. Nasir and Kehar Khan for their research assistance; and to the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at LUMS for financial support. Feedback from journal editor Jonathan Pattenden and two anonymous reviewers, one of whom we later learned was Haroon Akram‐Lodhi, has greatly improved this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Funding
M. Y. Aftab is thankful to Noaman G. Ali and Sameen Mohsin Ali for their continued support and guidance throughout the completion of this project. N. G. Ali is grateful to Muhammad Nasir, Mustansar Kamran, and Shahzad Ahmad for ongoing discussions about agrarian political economy and rural movements; to Luke Melchiorre and Barbara Harris‐White for their insights; to M. Nasir and Kehar Khan for their research assistance; and to the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at LUMS for financial support. Feedback from journal editor Jonathan Pattenden and two anonymous reviewers, one of whom we later learned was Haroon Akram‐Lodhi, has greatly improved this paper.
Keywords
- agrarian
- class struggle
- farmers' movements
- neoliberalism
- Pakistan
- populism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Global and Planetary Change
- Archaeology
- Anthropology
- Archaeology