Abstract
This chapter explores the relationship between ‘open systems’ and ‘open concepts’ in the context of educational policy and the research that sociologists of education engage in to analyse and inform it. Education should, it is argued, be seen as an open system where factors that include – but are certainly not limited to – teacher quality, curriculum design, and the social backgrounds of students in the classroom are inevitably variable and can be seen to have interdependent yet not entirely predictable influences on students' learning opportunities and outcomes. This chapter contrasts this ‘openness’ in education with a review of some recent policy initiatives that attempt to conceptualise education more narrowly as a closed system subject to improvement through the implementation of prescribed practices and curricula. It seeks to expose some of the problematic assumptions of these closed conceptions of educational practice and, by drawing specifically on some distinct but replicable features of Basil Bernstein's sociology of education, to chart a way back to a more open future for educational thinking.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Knowledge Production, Policy and Practice in Education |
| Subtitle of host publication | Social Realist Explorations of Curriculum, Teaching and Research |
| Editors | Grace Healy, Di Swift, Brian Barrett |
| Place of Publication | Abingdon, U. K. |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Chapter | 2 |
| Pages | 13-25 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781040563762 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781041093947 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2026 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Against the closing of educational thought: Open concepts and educational research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS