Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Addressing moral injury in the military

  • Andrea J. Phelps
  • , A. B. Adler
  • , S. A.H. Belanger
  • , C. Bennett
  • , H. Cramm
  • , L. Dell
  • , D. Fikretoglu
  • , D. Forbes
  • , A. Heber
  • , F. Hosseiny
  • , J. C. Morganstein
  • , D. Murphy
  • , A. Nazarov
  • , D. Pedlar
  • , J. D. Richardson
  • , N. Sadler
  • , V. Williamson
  • , N. Greenberg
  • , R. Jetly
  • University of Melbourne
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)
  • Royal Military College of Canada
  • New Zealand Defence Force
  • Queen's University, Kingston
  • Toronto Research Centre
  • Veterans Affairs Canada
  • McMaster University
  • Canadian Centre of Excellence on PTSD and Related Mental Health Conditions
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences F Edward Hebert School of Medicine
  • Combat Stress
  • King's College London
  • Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research
  • MacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre
  • Western University
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Ottawa

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

49   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Moral injury is a relatively new, but increasingly studied, construct in the field of mental health, particularly in relation to current and ex-serving military personnel. Moral injury refers to the enduring psychosocial, spiritual or ethical harms that can result from exposure to high-stakes events that strongly clash with one's moral beliefs. There is a pressing need for further research to advance understanding of the nature of moral injury; its relationship to mental disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder and depression; triggering events and underpinning mechanisms; and prevalence, prevention and treatment. In the meantime, military leaders have an immediate need for guidance on how moral injury should be addressed and, where possible, prevented. Such guidance should be theoretically sound, evidence-informed and ethically responsible. Further, the implementation of any practice change based on the guidance should contribute to the advancement of science through robust evaluation. This paper draws together current research on moral injury, best-practice approaches in the adjacent field of psychological resilience, and principles of effective implementation and evaluation. This research is combined with the military and veteran mental health expertise of the authors to provide guidance on the design, implementation and evaluation of moral injury interventions in the military. The paper discusses relevant training in military ethical practice, as well as the key roles leaders have in creating cohesive teams and having frank discussions about the moral and ethical challenges that military personnel face.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-55
Number of pages5
JournalBMJ Military Health
Volume170
Issue number1
Early online date15 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adult psychiatry
  • MENTAL HEALTH
  • PSYCHIATRY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing moral injury in the military'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this