Acute anxiety and social inference

An experimental manipulation with 7.5% carbon dioxide inhalation

Katherine S Button, Lucy Karwatowska, Daphne Kounali, Marcus R Munafò, Angela S Attwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive self-bias is thought to be protective for mental health. We previously found that the degree of positive bias when learning self-referential social evaluation decreases with increasing social anxiety. It is unclear whether this reduction is driven by differences in state or trait anxiety, as both are elevated in social anxiety; therefore, we examined the effects on the state of anxiety induced by the 7.5% carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation model of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) on social evaluation learning.

METHODS: For our study, 48 (24 of female gender) healthy volunteers took two inhalations (medical air and 7.5% CO2, counterbalanced) whilst learning social rules (self-like, self-dislike, other-like and other-dislike) in an instrumental social evaluation learning task. We analysed the outcomes (number of positive responses and errors to criterion) using the random effects Poisson regression.

RESULTS: Participants made fewer and more positive responses when breathing 7.5% CO2 in the other-like and other-dislike rules, respectively (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.03). Individuals made fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike, and this positive self-bias was unaffected by CO2. Breathing 7.5% CO2 increased errors, but only in the other-referential rules (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS: Positive self-bias (i.e. fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike) seemed robust to changes in state anxiety. In contrast, learning other-referential evaluation was impaired as state anxiety increased. This suggested that the previously observed variations in self-bias arise due to trait, rather than state, characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Psychopharmacology
Early online date4 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Carbon Dioxide
Inhalation
Anxiety
Learning
Respiration
Gases
Healthy Volunteers
Mental Health
Air

Cite this

Acute anxiety and social inference : An experimental manipulation with 7.5% carbon dioxide inhalation. / Button, Katherine S; Karwatowska, Lucy; Kounali, Daphne; Munafò, Marcus R; Attwood, Angela S.

In: Journal of Psychopharmacology , 04.07.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{202b94616f65477699adc95d37ec94da,
title = "Acute anxiety and social inference: An experimental manipulation with 7.5{\%} carbon dioxide inhalation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Positive self-bias is thought to be protective for mental health. We previously found that the degree of positive bias when learning self-referential social evaluation decreases with increasing social anxiety. It is unclear whether this reduction is driven by differences in state or trait anxiety, as both are elevated in social anxiety; therefore, we examined the effects on the state of anxiety induced by the 7.5{\%} carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation model of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) on social evaluation learning.METHODS: For our study, 48 (24 of female gender) healthy volunteers took two inhalations (medical air and 7.5{\%} CO2, counterbalanced) whilst learning social rules (self-like, self-dislike, other-like and other-dislike) in an instrumental social evaluation learning task. We analysed the outcomes (number of positive responses and errors to criterion) using the random effects Poisson regression.RESULTS: Participants made fewer and more positive responses when breathing 7.5{\%} CO2 in the other-like and other-dislike rules, respectively (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.03). Individuals made fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike, and this positive self-bias was unaffected by CO2. Breathing 7.5{\%} CO2 increased errors, but only in the other-referential rules (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.003).CONCLUSIONS: Positive self-bias (i.e. fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike) seemed robust to changes in state anxiety. In contrast, learning other-referential evaluation was impaired as state anxiety increased. This suggested that the previously observed variations in self-bias arise due to trait, rather than state, characteristics.",
author = "Button, {Katherine S} and Lucy Karwatowska and Daphne Kounali and Munaf{\`o}, {Marcus R} and Attwood, {Angela S}",
note = "{\circledC} The Author(s) 2016.",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0269881116653105",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Psychopharmacology",
issn = "0269-8811",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute anxiety and social inference

T2 - An experimental manipulation with 7.5% carbon dioxide inhalation

AU - Button, Katherine S

AU - Karwatowska, Lucy

AU - Kounali, Daphne

AU - Munafò, Marcus R

AU - Attwood, Angela S

N1 - © The Author(s) 2016.

PY - 2016/7/4

Y1 - 2016/7/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Positive self-bias is thought to be protective for mental health. We previously found that the degree of positive bias when learning self-referential social evaluation decreases with increasing social anxiety. It is unclear whether this reduction is driven by differences in state or trait anxiety, as both are elevated in social anxiety; therefore, we examined the effects on the state of anxiety induced by the 7.5% carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation model of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) on social evaluation learning.METHODS: For our study, 48 (24 of female gender) healthy volunteers took two inhalations (medical air and 7.5% CO2, counterbalanced) whilst learning social rules (self-like, self-dislike, other-like and other-dislike) in an instrumental social evaluation learning task. We analysed the outcomes (number of positive responses and errors to criterion) using the random effects Poisson regression.RESULTS: Participants made fewer and more positive responses when breathing 7.5% CO2 in the other-like and other-dislike rules, respectively (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.03). Individuals made fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike, and this positive self-bias was unaffected by CO2. Breathing 7.5% CO2 increased errors, but only in the other-referential rules (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.003).CONCLUSIONS: Positive self-bias (i.e. fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike) seemed robust to changes in state anxiety. In contrast, learning other-referential evaluation was impaired as state anxiety increased. This suggested that the previously observed variations in self-bias arise due to trait, rather than state, characteristics.

AB - BACKGROUND: Positive self-bias is thought to be protective for mental health. We previously found that the degree of positive bias when learning self-referential social evaluation decreases with increasing social anxiety. It is unclear whether this reduction is driven by differences in state or trait anxiety, as both are elevated in social anxiety; therefore, we examined the effects on the state of anxiety induced by the 7.5% carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation model of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) on social evaluation learning.METHODS: For our study, 48 (24 of female gender) healthy volunteers took two inhalations (medical air and 7.5% CO2, counterbalanced) whilst learning social rules (self-like, self-dislike, other-like and other-dislike) in an instrumental social evaluation learning task. We analysed the outcomes (number of positive responses and errors to criterion) using the random effects Poisson regression.RESULTS: Participants made fewer and more positive responses when breathing 7.5% CO2 in the other-like and other-dislike rules, respectively (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.03). Individuals made fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike, and this positive self-bias was unaffected by CO2. Breathing 7.5% CO2 increased errors, but only in the other-referential rules (gas × condition × rule interaction p = 0.003).CONCLUSIONS: Positive self-bias (i.e. fewer errors learning self-like than self-dislike) seemed robust to changes in state anxiety. In contrast, learning other-referential evaluation was impaired as state anxiety increased. This suggested that the previously observed variations in self-bias arise due to trait, rather than state, characteristics.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269881116653105

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269881116653105

U2 - 10.1177/0269881116653105

DO - 10.1177/0269881116653105

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Psychopharmacology

JF - Journal of Psychopharmacology

SN - 0269-8811

ER -