Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches?

Francis Robinson, Barry Williams

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

As power-switches improve, the primary function of switching-aid circuits changes from modifying the shape or rate-of-traverse of V-I loci within device
safe-operating-areas (SOA's), to clamping transient current and voltage, at turn-on and turn-off, below peak current and voltage ratings. Also, as device
ruggedness and device parameters are improved, or made less variable between devices and with operating conditions, active-snubbing or active-clamping becomes feasible, whereby the magnitude of peak-current at turn-on and peak-voltage at turn-off are limited by gate or drive-circuit control, or inherently by the devices themselves. Examples have been reported, however, none of these adequately compares active and passive snubbing, or exposes salient disadvantages in active-snubbing. A more objective appraisal of active snubbing
is attempted here, which uses as its basis for comparison; turn-on and turn-off commutation energy-loss, on-state energy-loss, overload capacity,
and turn-on and turn-off delay. Irrespective of whether active or passive snubbers or clamps are used, switch turn-off voltage-waveforms are often characterised by fast voltage-overshoot above the dc-supply voltage, or above the threshold-level of voltage-clamps, when used. High-frequency ringing
inevitably follows turn-off, or the beginning or end of voltage-clamping. The cause and solution are examined.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publication14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88.
Place of PublicationSingapore
PublisherIEEE
Pages617-622
Number of pages6
Volume3
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1988
Event14th Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society, 1988. IECON 1988 - Singapore, Singapore
Duration: 24 Oct 198827 Oct 1988

Conference

Conference14th Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society, 1988. IECON 1988
CountrySingapore
CitySingapore
Period24/10/8827/10/88

Fingerprint

ringing
energy
aid
loss
parameter
appraisal
rate
comparison

Cite this

Robinson, F., & Williams, B. (1988). Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches? In 14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88. (Vol. 3, pp. 617-622). Singapore: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.1988.665754

Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches? / Robinson, Francis; Williams, Barry.

14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88. . Vol. 3 Singapore : IEEE, 1988. p. 617-622.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Robinson, F & Williams, B 1988, Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches? in 14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88. . vol. 3, IEEE, Singapore, pp. 617-622, 14th Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society, 1988. IECON 1988, Singapore, Singapore, 24/10/88. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.1988.665754
Robinson F, Williams B. Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches? In 14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88. . Vol. 3. Singapore: IEEE. 1988. p. 617-622 https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.1988.665754
Robinson, Francis ; Williams, Barry. / Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches?. 14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88. . Vol. 3 Singapore : IEEE, 1988. pp. 617-622
@inproceedings{e82a016f7aeb413fb5f47255cda1e1bb,
title = "Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches?",
abstract = "As power-switches improve, the primary function of switching-aid circuits changes from modifying the shape or rate-of-traverse of V-I loci within devicesafe-operating-areas (SOA's), to clamping transient current and voltage, at turn-on and turn-off, below peak current and voltage ratings. Also, as deviceruggedness and device parameters are improved, or made less variable between devices and with operating conditions, active-snubbing or active-clamping becomes feasible, whereby the magnitude of peak-current at turn-on and peak-voltage at turn-off are limited by gate or drive-circuit control, or inherently by the devices themselves. Examples have been reported, however, none of these adequately compares active and passive snubbing, or exposes salient disadvantages in active-snubbing. A more objective appraisal of active snubbingis attempted here, which uses as its basis for comparison; turn-on and turn-off commutation energy-loss, on-state energy-loss, overload capacity,and turn-on and turn-off delay. Irrespective of whether active or passive snubbers or clamps are used, switch turn-off voltage-waveforms are often characterised by fast voltage-overshoot above the dc-supply voltage, or above the threshold-level of voltage-clamps, when used. High-frequency ringinginevitably follows turn-off, or the beginning or end of voltage-clamping. The cause and solution are examined.",
author = "Francis Robinson and Barry Williams",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1109/IECON.1988.665754",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "617--622",
booktitle = "14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88.",
publisher = "IEEE",
address = "USA United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Active-Snubbing Or Passive-Snubbing for Fast Switches?

AU - Robinson, Francis

AU - Williams, Barry

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - As power-switches improve, the primary function of switching-aid circuits changes from modifying the shape or rate-of-traverse of V-I loci within devicesafe-operating-areas (SOA's), to clamping transient current and voltage, at turn-on and turn-off, below peak current and voltage ratings. Also, as deviceruggedness and device parameters are improved, or made less variable between devices and with operating conditions, active-snubbing or active-clamping becomes feasible, whereby the magnitude of peak-current at turn-on and peak-voltage at turn-off are limited by gate or drive-circuit control, or inherently by the devices themselves. Examples have been reported, however, none of these adequately compares active and passive snubbing, or exposes salient disadvantages in active-snubbing. A more objective appraisal of active snubbingis attempted here, which uses as its basis for comparison; turn-on and turn-off commutation energy-loss, on-state energy-loss, overload capacity,and turn-on and turn-off delay. Irrespective of whether active or passive snubbers or clamps are used, switch turn-off voltage-waveforms are often characterised by fast voltage-overshoot above the dc-supply voltage, or above the threshold-level of voltage-clamps, when used. High-frequency ringinginevitably follows turn-off, or the beginning or end of voltage-clamping. The cause and solution are examined.

AB - As power-switches improve, the primary function of switching-aid circuits changes from modifying the shape or rate-of-traverse of V-I loci within devicesafe-operating-areas (SOA's), to clamping transient current and voltage, at turn-on and turn-off, below peak current and voltage ratings. Also, as deviceruggedness and device parameters are improved, or made less variable between devices and with operating conditions, active-snubbing or active-clamping becomes feasible, whereby the magnitude of peak-current at turn-on and peak-voltage at turn-off are limited by gate or drive-circuit control, or inherently by the devices themselves. Examples have been reported, however, none of these adequately compares active and passive snubbing, or exposes salient disadvantages in active-snubbing. A more objective appraisal of active snubbingis attempted here, which uses as its basis for comparison; turn-on and turn-off commutation energy-loss, on-state energy-loss, overload capacity,and turn-on and turn-off delay. Irrespective of whether active or passive snubbers or clamps are used, switch turn-off voltage-waveforms are often characterised by fast voltage-overshoot above the dc-supply voltage, or above the threshold-level of voltage-clamps, when used. High-frequency ringinginevitably follows turn-off, or the beginning or end of voltage-clamping. The cause and solution are examined.

UR - http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=665754

U2 - 10.1109/IECON.1988.665754

DO - 10.1109/IECON.1988.665754

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 3

SP - 617

EP - 622

BT - 14 Annual Conference of Industrial Electronics Society. IECON '88.

PB - IEEE

CY - Singapore

ER -