Abstract
Alkali-activated materials are promising low-carbon alternatives to Portland cement; however, there remains an absence of a fundamental understanding of the effect of different activator types on their reaction products at the atomic scale. Solid-state 27Al and 29Si magic angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and 1H-29Si cross-polarization MAS NMR spectroscopy are used to reveal the effect of the activator anion on the nanostructure, cross-linking, and local hydration of aged alkali-activated slag cements. The main reaction product identified is a mixed cross-linked/non-cross-linked sodium-substituted calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (C-(N)-A-S-H) gel with a structure comparable to tobermorite 11 Å. Analysis of cross-polarization kinetics revealed that a higher content of soluble silicate in the activator promoted the incorporation of Al into the aluminosilicate chains of C-(N)-A-S-H gels, charge-balanced preferentially by protons within the gel interlayer. In sodium carbonate-activated slag cements, aluminosilicate chains of C-(N)-A-S-H gels are instead charge-balanced preferentially by Ca2+ or AlV ions. Hydrotalcite was observed as a secondary reaction product independent of the activator used and in higher quantities as the content of sodium carbonate in the activator increases. The presence of soluble silicates in the activator promotes the formation of an Al-rich sodium aluminosilicate hydrate (N-A-S-H) gel which was not identified when using sodium carbonate as the activator. These results demonstrate that the anion type in the activator promotes significant differences in the nanostructure and local hydration of the main binding phases forming in alkali-activated slag cements. This explains the significant differences in properties identified when using these different activators.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 20727-20739 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Physical Chemistry C |
Volume | 125 |
Issue number | 37 |
Early online date | 9 Sept 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Sept 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study has been funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK, through grant EP/M003272/1. Participation of S.A. Bernal was partially funded by the EPSRC through EC fellowship EP/R001642/1. All solid-state NMR spectra were obtained at the EPSRC UK National Solid-state NMR Service at Durham, and we thank Dr David Apperley for his assistance with acquiring the data. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this article for their constructive input regarding interpretation of some of the NMR data.
Funding
This study has been funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK, through grant EP/M003272/1. Participation of S.A. Bernal was partially funded by the EPSRC through EC fellowship EP/R001642/1. All solid-state NMR spectra were obtained at the EPSRC UK National Solid-state NMR Service at Durham, and we thank Dr David Apperley for his assistance with acquiring the data. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this article for their constructive input regarding interpretation of some of the NMR data.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- General Energy
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films