Abstract
Mine tailings, produced at rates exceeding 10 billion tonnes annually, constitute the world’s largest industrial waste stream. Catastrophic failures have caused loss of life, contamination, and long-term ecological harm, underscoring the need for sustainable and systematic management strategies. Yet they also represent an untapped resource for sustainable construction. Unlocking this potential requires activation techniques capable of generating reactive phases, as well as decision frameworks that can guide their responsible deployment. Therefore, this study introduces a mineral-based mechanical activation framework that supports informed evaluation of the activation behaviour and valorisation potential of mine tailings. The framework classifies minerals by their potential cementitious contribution following mechanical activation and their susceptibility to amorphisation, based on intrinsic mineralogical attributes. Case studies on multi-mineral mine tailings demonstrate broad consistency with the proposed framework: silica–alumina contributor group–dominated tailings tend to enhance pozzolanic reactivity, oxide contributor group–dominated tailings generally show limited response, and unsuitable mineral group–dominated tailings largely remain inert under mechanical activation. The framework provides a basis for mechanical activation as a systematic, design-informed decision strategy rather than an ad hoc empirical practice, grounded in the mineralogical fingerprint of mine tailings. Its mineralogical basis also offers a transferable conceptual basis for evaluating other industrial residues, providing a generic template for resource-efficient valorisation. The framework supports a shift in tailings utilisation away from a linear take–make–dispose paradigm toward more knowledge-driven evaluation and utilisation strategies, enabling more systematic assessment across waste streams and alignment with circular-economy and net-zero targets. Illustratively, enabling a ~15% substitution across 1 million tonnes of cement would valorise ~0.15 Mt of residues and avoid ~0.09–0.12 Mt CO₂.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 110496 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Minerals Engineering |
| Issue number | 110496 |
| Early online date | 10 Jun 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Jun 2026 |
Data Availability Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Rachel Paul, Business Unit Leader for Mineral Resource Management at Acrux Gold, for her valuable insights and for providing key information that supported the development of this review.Funding
This work was supported by the Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE) through a Research Collaboration Grant (Ref: RSE 6037), and by the Heriot-Watt University Small Project Grants Scheme (October 2025).
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Mine tailings valorisation
- Mechanical activation
- Mineralogical fingerprint
- Decision-oriented framework
- Energy efficiency
- Cementitious materials
- Circular economy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Activating the Hidden Potential of Mine Tailings: A Mineral-Based Mechanical Activation Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS