Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship

Daniel Lerner, Richard Hunt, Dimo Dimov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Entrepreneurial action is central to entrepreneurship theory, and is broadly seen to arise as a consequence of intendedly rational logics (whether causal or effectual), reflecting reasoned judgment. But, is this always the case? While entrepreneurial action may often be the result of a judgmental decision (between alternative courses of action/inaction), the presumption that reasoned judgment encompasses all the motives, modes and mechanisms leading to entrepreneurial outcomes seems dubious. Building on an emerging literature that seeks to address the boundaries of reasoned entrepreneurial action, we develop the notion that non-deliberative impulse-driven behavioral logics can also be the basis for business venturing. Our framework offers a complementary perspective to the intendedly-rational, deliberate logics perspective, opening novel pathways for future research and theory-building.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52 - 69
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Business Venturing
Volume33
Issue number1
Early online date25 Oct 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Industry
Entrepreneurship
Impulse
Theory building
Pathway

Cite this

Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship. / Lerner, Daniel; Hunt, Richard; Dimov, Dimo.

In: Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 52 - 69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lerner, Daniel; Hunt, Richard; Dimov, Dimo / Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship.

In: Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 52 - 69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da0d013282074f6d9950bf42cbfe0fd6,
title = "Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship",
abstract = "Entrepreneurial action is central to entrepreneurship theory, and is broadly seen to arise as a consequence of intendedly rational logics (whether causal or effectual), reflecting reasoned judgment. But, is this always the case? While entrepreneurial action may often be the result of a judgmental decision (between alternative courses of action/inaction), the presumption that reasoned judgment encompasses all the motives, modes and mechanisms leading to entrepreneurial outcomes seems dubious. Building on an emerging literature that seeks to address the boundaries of reasoned entrepreneurial action, we develop the notion that non-deliberative impulse-driven behavioral logics can also be the basis for business venturing. Our framework offers a complementary perspective to the intendedly-rational, deliberate logics perspective, opening novel pathways for future research and theory-building.",
author = "Daniel Lerner and Richard Hunt and Dimo Dimov",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.10.002",
volume = "33",
pages = "52 -- 69",
journal = "Journal of Business Venturing",
issn = "0883-9026",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship

AU - Lerner,Daniel

AU - Hunt,Richard

AU - Dimov,Dimo

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Entrepreneurial action is central to entrepreneurship theory, and is broadly seen to arise as a consequence of intendedly rational logics (whether causal or effectual), reflecting reasoned judgment. But, is this always the case? While entrepreneurial action may often be the result of a judgmental decision (between alternative courses of action/inaction), the presumption that reasoned judgment encompasses all the motives, modes and mechanisms leading to entrepreneurial outcomes seems dubious. Building on an emerging literature that seeks to address the boundaries of reasoned entrepreneurial action, we develop the notion that non-deliberative impulse-driven behavioral logics can also be the basis for business venturing. Our framework offers a complementary perspective to the intendedly-rational, deliberate logics perspective, opening novel pathways for future research and theory-building.

AB - Entrepreneurial action is central to entrepreneurship theory, and is broadly seen to arise as a consequence of intendedly rational logics (whether causal or effectual), reflecting reasoned judgment. But, is this always the case? While entrepreneurial action may often be the result of a judgmental decision (between alternative courses of action/inaction), the presumption that reasoned judgment encompasses all the motives, modes and mechanisms leading to entrepreneurial outcomes seems dubious. Building on an emerging literature that seeks to address the boundaries of reasoned entrepreneurial action, we develop the notion that non-deliberative impulse-driven behavioral logics can also be the basis for business venturing. Our framework offers a complementary perspective to the intendedly-rational, deliberate logics perspective, opening novel pathways for future research and theory-building.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 52

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Business Venturing

T2 - Journal of Business Venturing

JF - Journal of Business Venturing

SN - 0883-9026

IS - 1

ER -