Abstract
We present a model of transitive inference (TI) using ACT-R which strengthens the hypothesis that TI is not dependent on underlying sequential ordering of stimuli, but rather on the learning of productions. We nevertheless find a weakness in the ACT-R sub-symbolic learning system and suggest improvements.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 1470-1475 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Event | The 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2004) - Chicago Duration: 1 Jan 2004 → … |
Conference
Conference | The 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2004) |
---|---|
City | Chicago |
Period | 1/01/04 → … |