Accounting, intangible assets, stock market activity, and measurement and disclosure policy

views from the U.K.

Elisabeth Dedman, Suliaman Mouselli, Yun Shen, Andrew W Stark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers the impact of U.K. practices with respect to the measurement and disclosure of intangible assets, focusing on R&D activities. We first update prior U.K. work relating R&D activities to market prices. Second, given the clearly identified role of disclosure outside of the financial statements in helping market participants value R&D expenditures, we consider whether market forces are generally sufficient to ensure adequate disclosures with respect to intangibles by considering the cases of two biotechnology firms involved in the issuance of misleading disclosures. Within this context, we consider how disclosure regulation and enforcement mechanisms have evolved in recent years, and how this evolution has likely been affected by our ‘scandal’ cases. Our conclusions are that the case of the U.K. does not give rise to any wide-scale concerns about the economic ill-effects caused by the current state of recognition and disclosure with respect to expenditures on intangibles. Further, market forces are unlikely to be sufficient in ensuring honest and timely disclosures with respect to intangibles, but the combination of official regulation and voluntary self-regulation appears to have stemmed the tide of any such disclosure scandals in the U.K.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)312-341
JournalAbacus A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies
Volume45
Issue number3
Early online date9 Sep 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Market activity
Disclosure
Disclosure policy
Stock market
Intangible assets
Intangibles
Scandal
Market forces
Expenditure
Market price
Self-regulation
Biotechnology firms
Economics
Financial statements
Disclosure regulation
Enforcement

Cite this

Accounting, intangible assets, stock market activity, and measurement and disclosure policy : views from the U.K. / Dedman, Elisabeth; Mouselli, Suliaman; Shen, Yun; Stark, Andrew W.

In: Abacus A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 312-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fac65085e7d94a4681cde00ed2aeb879,
title = "Accounting, intangible assets, stock market activity, and measurement and disclosure policy: views from the U.K.",
abstract = "This paper considers the impact of U.K. practices with respect to the measurement and disclosure of intangible assets, focusing on R&D activities. We first update prior U.K. work relating R&D activities to market prices. Second, given the clearly identified role of disclosure outside of the financial statements in helping market participants value R&D expenditures, we consider whether market forces are generally sufficient to ensure adequate disclosures with respect to intangibles by considering the cases of two biotechnology firms involved in the issuance of misleading disclosures. Within this context, we consider how disclosure regulation and enforcement mechanisms have evolved in recent years, and how this evolution has likely been affected by our ‘scandal’ cases. Our conclusions are that the case of the U.K. does not give rise to any wide-scale concerns about the economic ill-effects caused by the current state of recognition and disclosure with respect to expenditures on intangibles. Further, market forces are unlikely to be sufficient in ensuring honest and timely disclosures with respect to intangibles, but the combination of official regulation and voluntary self-regulation appears to have stemmed the tide of any such disclosure scandals in the U.K.",
author = "Elisabeth Dedman and Suliaman Mouselli and Yun Shen and Stark, {Andrew W}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00291.x",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "312--341",
journal = "Abacus A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies",
issn = "0001-3072",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting, intangible assets, stock market activity, and measurement and disclosure policy

T2 - views from the U.K.

AU - Dedman, Elisabeth

AU - Mouselli, Suliaman

AU - Shen, Yun

AU - Stark, Andrew W

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - This paper considers the impact of U.K. practices with respect to the measurement and disclosure of intangible assets, focusing on R&D activities. We first update prior U.K. work relating R&D activities to market prices. Second, given the clearly identified role of disclosure outside of the financial statements in helping market participants value R&D expenditures, we consider whether market forces are generally sufficient to ensure adequate disclosures with respect to intangibles by considering the cases of two biotechnology firms involved in the issuance of misleading disclosures. Within this context, we consider how disclosure regulation and enforcement mechanisms have evolved in recent years, and how this evolution has likely been affected by our ‘scandal’ cases. Our conclusions are that the case of the U.K. does not give rise to any wide-scale concerns about the economic ill-effects caused by the current state of recognition and disclosure with respect to expenditures on intangibles. Further, market forces are unlikely to be sufficient in ensuring honest and timely disclosures with respect to intangibles, but the combination of official regulation and voluntary self-regulation appears to have stemmed the tide of any such disclosure scandals in the U.K.

AB - This paper considers the impact of U.K. practices with respect to the measurement and disclosure of intangible assets, focusing on R&D activities. We first update prior U.K. work relating R&D activities to market prices. Second, given the clearly identified role of disclosure outside of the financial statements in helping market participants value R&D expenditures, we consider whether market forces are generally sufficient to ensure adequate disclosures with respect to intangibles by considering the cases of two biotechnology firms involved in the issuance of misleading disclosures. Within this context, we consider how disclosure regulation and enforcement mechanisms have evolved in recent years, and how this evolution has likely been affected by our ‘scandal’ cases. Our conclusions are that the case of the U.K. does not give rise to any wide-scale concerns about the economic ill-effects caused by the current state of recognition and disclosure with respect to expenditures on intangibles. Further, market forces are unlikely to be sufficient in ensuring honest and timely disclosures with respect to intangibles, but the combination of official regulation and voluntary self-regulation appears to have stemmed the tide of any such disclosure scandals in the U.K.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349143097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00291.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00291.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00291.x

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 312

EP - 341

JO - Abacus A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies

JF - Abacus A Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies

SN - 0001-3072

IS - 3

ER -