Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes

Brian Kelly, Helen Petrie, David Sloan, Patrick Lauke, Stephen Brown, Simon Ball, Jane Seale

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

  • 63 Citations

Abstract

The work of the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) is described in a set of technical guidelines designed to maximise accessibility to digital resources. Further activities continue to focus on technical developments, with current discussions exploring the potential merits of use of Semantic Web and Web 2.0 approaches. In this paper we argue that the focus on technologies can be counter-productive. Rather than seeking to enhance accessibility through technical innovations, the authors argue that the priority should be for a user-focussed approach, which embeds best practices through the development of achievable policies and processes and which includes all stakeholders in the process of maximising accessibility. The paper reviews previous work in this area and summarises criticisms of WAI’s approach. The paper further develops a tangram model which describes a pluralistic, as opposed to a universal, approach to Web accessibility, which encourages creativity and diversity in developing accessible services. Such diversity will need to reflect the context of usage, including the aims of a service (informational, educational, cultural, etc.), the users’ and the services providers’ environment. The paper describes a stakeholder approach to embedding best practices, which recognises that organisations will encounter difficulties in developing sustainable approaches by addressing only the needs of the end user and the Web developer. Thepaper describes work which has informed the ideas in this paper and plans for further work, including an approach to advocacy and education which coins the “Accessibility 2.0” term to describe a renewed approach to accessibility, which builds on previous work but prioritises the importance of the user. The paper concludes by describing the implications of the ideas described in this paper for WAI and for accessibility practitioner stakeholders.

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A).
Period1/05/07 → …

Fingerprint

stakeholder
stakeholder approach
technical innovation
technical development
service provider
best practice
semantics
resources
education

Keywords

  • Methodologies
  • Web accessibility
  • WCAG
  • Guidelines
  • Contextual design
  • WAI
  • People with disabilities

Cite this

Kelly, B., Petrie, H., Sloan, D., Lauke, P., Brown, S., Ball, S., & Seale, J. (2007). Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes. 138-147. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)., .DOI: 10.1145/1243441.1243471

Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes. / Kelly, Brian; Petrie, Helen; Sloan, David; Lauke, Patrick; Brown, Stephen; Ball, Simon; Seale, Jane.

2007. 138-147 Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)., .

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Kelly, B, Petrie, H, Sloan, D, Lauke, P, Brown, S, Ball, S & Seale, J 2007, 'Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes' Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)., 1/05/07, pp. 138-147. DOI: 10.1145/1243441.1243471
Kelly B, Petrie H, Sloan D, Lauke P, Brown S, Ball S et al. Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes. 2007. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)., . Available from, DOI: 10.1145/1243441.1243471
Kelly, Brian ; Petrie, Helen ; Sloan, David ; Lauke, Patrick ; Brown, Stephen ; Ball, Simon ; Seale, Jane. / Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)., .10 p.
@conference{b0d93c6395a941938444ef6afafdbdbe,
title = "Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes",
abstract = "The work of the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) is described in a set of technical guidelines designed to maximise accessibility to digital resources. Further activities continue to focus on technical developments, with current discussions exploring the potential merits of use of Semantic Web and Web 2.0 approaches. In this paper we argue that the focus on technologies can be counter-productive. Rather than seeking to enhance accessibility through technical innovations, the authors argue that the priority should be for a user-focussed approach, which embeds best practices through the development of achievable policies and processes and which includes all stakeholders in the process of maximising accessibility. The paper reviews previous work in this area and summarises criticisms of WAI’s approach. The paper further develops a tangram model which describes a pluralistic, as opposed to a universal, approach to Web accessibility, which encourages creativity and diversity in developing accessible services. Such diversity will need to reflect the context of usage, including the aims of a service (informational, educational, cultural, etc.), the users’ and the services providers’ environment. The paper describes a stakeholder approach to embedding best practices, which recognises that organisations will encounter difficulties in developing sustainable approaches by addressing only the needs of the end user and the Web developer. Thepaper describes work which has informed the ideas in this paper and plans for further work, including an approach to advocacy and education which coins the “Accessibility 2.0” term to describe a renewed approach to accessibility, which builds on previous work but prioritises the importance of the user. The paper concludes by describing the implications of the ideas described in this paper for WAI and for accessibility practitioner stakeholders.",
keywords = "Methodologies, Web accessibility, WCAG, Guidelines, Contextual design, WAI, People with disabilities",
author = "Brian Kelly and Helen Petrie and David Sloan and Patrick Lauke and Stephen Brown and Simon Ball and Jane Seale",
note = "This paper was presented at the International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. This event had the theme {"}Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web: Hindrance or Opportunity?{"} held in Banff, Canada on 7-8 May 2007. The paper was presented by Brian Kelly on Tuesday, 8 May 2007.; Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A). ; Conference date: 01-05-2007",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1145/1243441.1243471",
language = "English",
pages = "138--147",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Accessibility 2.0: People, Policies and Processes

AU - Kelly,Brian

AU - Petrie,Helen

AU - Sloan,David

AU - Lauke,Patrick

AU - Brown,Stephen

AU - Ball,Simon

AU - Seale,Jane

N1 - This paper was presented at the International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. This event had the theme "Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web: Hindrance or Opportunity?" held in Banff, Canada on 7-8 May 2007. The paper was presented by Brian Kelly on Tuesday, 8 May 2007.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - The work of the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) is described in a set of technical guidelines designed to maximise accessibility to digital resources. Further activities continue to focus on technical developments, with current discussions exploring the potential merits of use of Semantic Web and Web 2.0 approaches. In this paper we argue that the focus on technologies can be counter-productive. Rather than seeking to enhance accessibility through technical innovations, the authors argue that the priority should be for a user-focussed approach, which embeds best practices through the development of achievable policies and processes and which includes all stakeholders in the process of maximising accessibility. The paper reviews previous work in this area and summarises criticisms of WAI’s approach. The paper further develops a tangram model which describes a pluralistic, as opposed to a universal, approach to Web accessibility, which encourages creativity and diversity in developing accessible services. Such diversity will need to reflect the context of usage, including the aims of a service (informational, educational, cultural, etc.), the users’ and the services providers’ environment. The paper describes a stakeholder approach to embedding best practices, which recognises that organisations will encounter difficulties in developing sustainable approaches by addressing only the needs of the end user and the Web developer. Thepaper describes work which has informed the ideas in this paper and plans for further work, including an approach to advocacy and education which coins the “Accessibility 2.0” term to describe a renewed approach to accessibility, which builds on previous work but prioritises the importance of the user. The paper concludes by describing the implications of the ideas described in this paper for WAI and for accessibility practitioner stakeholders.

AB - The work of the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) is described in a set of technical guidelines designed to maximise accessibility to digital resources. Further activities continue to focus on technical developments, with current discussions exploring the potential merits of use of Semantic Web and Web 2.0 approaches. In this paper we argue that the focus on technologies can be counter-productive. Rather than seeking to enhance accessibility through technical innovations, the authors argue that the priority should be for a user-focussed approach, which embeds best practices through the development of achievable policies and processes and which includes all stakeholders in the process of maximising accessibility. The paper reviews previous work in this area and summarises criticisms of WAI’s approach. The paper further develops a tangram model which describes a pluralistic, as opposed to a universal, approach to Web accessibility, which encourages creativity and diversity in developing accessible services. Such diversity will need to reflect the context of usage, including the aims of a service (informational, educational, cultural, etc.), the users’ and the services providers’ environment. The paper describes a stakeholder approach to embedding best practices, which recognises that organisations will encounter difficulties in developing sustainable approaches by addressing only the needs of the end user and the Web developer. Thepaper describes work which has informed the ideas in this paper and plans for further work, including an approach to advocacy and education which coins the “Accessibility 2.0” term to describe a renewed approach to accessibility, which builds on previous work but prioritises the importance of the user. The paper concludes by describing the implications of the ideas described in this paper for WAI and for accessibility practitioner stakeholders.

KW - Methodologies

KW - Web accessibility

KW - WCAG

KW - Guidelines

KW - Contextual design

KW - WAI

KW - People with disabilities

UR - http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/papers/w4a-2007/

UR - http://www.w4a.info/2007/prog/15-kelly.pdf

U2 - 10.1145/1243441.1243471

DO - 10.1145/1243441.1243471

M3 - Paper

SP - 138

EP - 147

ER -