Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Access to Justice in the Family Court: an exploration of key issues and barriers to justice

Alex Newbury, Sarah Moore

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceedingBook chapter

Abstract

Drawing on research conducted over the two-year period prior to, during, and directly after the coronavirus pandemic of 2019-21, this chapter considers the impact of Legal Aid cuts for litigants in person (LiPs) in the family courts, and the extent to which the pandemic affected and exacerbated this impact. It outlines key factors that appear to have profound practical effects on access to justice for LiPs, drawn from focus group research with student legal companions plus one-to-one interviews about experiences of supporting LiPs with the Sussex Law Clinic administrator. Key findings include the impacts of ‘legalese’ in court documents and of imbalances of power between litigants, most particularly the impact for litigants who have suffered domestic abuse from the other party in the proceedings. Technical barriers, both in relation to technical knowledge and in access to IT equipment, were especially acute during the pandemic when much went on-line and the libraries and courts shut, but these have become entrenched in some areas, with many courts still operating a significant number of hearings online. The research also highlighted the practical barriers LiPs experience in having the necessary understanding of what documentation is relevant and important to support their case and what is not.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJustice Denied
Subtitle of host publicationExploring Inequities in the Legal System
EditorsEd Johnston, Claire-Michelle Smyth
Place of PublicationAbingdon, U. K.
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter5
Pages64-78
Number of pages15
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781003496823
ISBN (Print)9781032803791
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2025

Publication series

NameRoutledge Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice and Procedure

Funding

Underpinning funding: The empirical study was funded by a British Academy Small Grant (number SRG1819\190675, project title 'Lost in the Process? Access to Justice in an Age of Legal Aid Reform), with Alex Newbury (University of Brighton) as the PI.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Access to Justice in the Family Court: an exploration of key issues and barriers to justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this