Access to health and rights of children in street situations and working children: a scoping review

Eva Jörgensen, Sharanya Napier-Raman, Shona Macleod, Rajeev Seth, Michael Goodman, Neil Howard, Jónína Einarsdóttir, Meghendra Banerjee, Shanti Raman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Street and working children (SWC) and young people (YP) are highly vulnerable to violence, exploitation, hazardous environments and human rights violations. While the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the International Labour Organisation provide some guidance, there is limited information on their right to healthcare. This study aims to identify enablers and barriers to healthcare access for SWC and document associated rights violations. Methods From 2000 to the present, we conducted systematic searches for SWC (0-18 years) in databases including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EBSCO, PUBMED and PROQUEST, using broad search terms related to street children, working children, healthcare access and rights. The searches were supplemented by grey literature and hand searches. Two independent reviewers finalised the included studies, and data were analysed using a rights-based framework with narrative analysis and thematisation. Results The initial search yielded 7346 articles (5972 for street children and 1374 for working children), with 35 studies (18 for street children and 17 for working children) included in the review. Most studies on working children (13/17) focused on trafficking/commercial exploitation. Studies were predominantly from Africa, followed by the USA, Asia, the UK and Canada, with only two employing a rights framework. SWC face barriers such as cost, distance, visibility/accessibility of services, stigma, seclusion, threats of violence, lack of legal documents, crisis-oriented healthcare use and self-medication. Enablers included agency, self-efficacy, positive relationships with adults and proactive healthcare use when accessible. Emergency departments are frequently accessed by SWC, indicating a need for healthcare professionals to be trained and sensitised. Holistic and comprehensive healthcare is essential. Conclusion Significant research gaps exist, with many SWC populations under-represented. SWC share healthcare access barriers with other marginalised groups. Healthcare for SWC must be tailored to their unique needs and strengths and be holistic and trauma-informed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number002870
JournalBMJ Paediatrics Open
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Oct 2024

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable as no data sets generated and/or analysed for this study.

Keywords

  • adolescent health
  • child health
  • health policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Access to health and rights of children in street situations and working children: a scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this