Accepting low back pain: Is it related to a good quality of life?

V L Mason, B Mathias, S M Skevington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Whether individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are willing to accept their pain, is of interest to pain management, but how far is the acceptance of pain related to a good quality of life (QoL)? Recently available measures now enable this question to be investigated; these are (1) the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and a revised version, here described as a short-form (SF-CPAQ), and (2) the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL)Pain, which is composed of the generic WHOQOL-100 profile (25 facets in 6 domains), and 4 additional facets within a specific pain and discomfort module (PDM). Method: Eighty-six CLBP outpatients (62.8% female, mean age 54.3 y, mean pain duration 69.4 mo) completed the CPAQ and WHOQOL-Pain, mailed 2 weeks before a pain clinic appointment. Results: General QoL was positively associated with overall acceptance of pain (CPAQ: r = 0.376, P = 0.003; SF-CPAQ: r = 0.582, P < 0.001), and with activity engagement (r = 0.455, P < 0.001) and pain willingness (r = 0.493, P < 0.001) specifically. Lower reports of pain were also associated with a better QoL (r = - 0.349, P = 0.002). Pain level was important in explaining QoL relating to the physical and social domains and pain-related facets assessed by the PDM. Overall, acceptance contributed to explain QoL in the level of independence and environment domains and for pain-related QoL assessed by the PDM. However, pain and acceptance only made a modest contribution to explaining psychologic and social dimensions of QoL. Discussion: The results indicate that present pain level and whether or not pain is accepted play an important role in the QoL of patients with chronic pain. Additionally, the results provide construct validity for the WHOQOL-Pain and SF-CPAQ measures, especially dimensions of pain willingness and activities engagement. The findings have implications for the way health care is delivered, particularly for the role of acceptance-based treatments for individuals with CLBP.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-29
Number of pages8
JournalThe Clinical Journal of Pain
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Quality of Life
Pain
Chronic Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain Clinics
Pain Management
Surveys and Questionnaires
Appointments and Schedules

Cite this

Accepting low back pain: Is it related to a good quality of life? / Mason, V L; Mathias, B; Skevington, S M.

In: The Clinical Journal of Pain, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2008, p. 22-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mason, V L ; Mathias, B ; Skevington, S M. / Accepting low back pain: Is it related to a good quality of life?. In: The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2008 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 22-29.
@article{cc31d3efe9de4fda932e398737f916df,
title = "Accepting low back pain: Is it related to a good quality of life?",
abstract = "Objectives: Whether individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are willing to accept their pain, is of interest to pain management, but how far is the acceptance of pain related to a good quality of life (QoL)? Recently available measures now enable this question to be investigated; these are (1) the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and a revised version, here described as a short-form (SF-CPAQ), and (2) the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL)Pain, which is composed of the generic WHOQOL-100 profile (25 facets in 6 domains), and 4 additional facets within a specific pain and discomfort module (PDM). Method: Eighty-six CLBP outpatients (62.8{\%} female, mean age 54.3 y, mean pain duration 69.4 mo) completed the CPAQ and WHOQOL-Pain, mailed 2 weeks before a pain clinic appointment. Results: General QoL was positively associated with overall acceptance of pain (CPAQ: r = 0.376, P = 0.003; SF-CPAQ: r = 0.582, P < 0.001), and with activity engagement (r = 0.455, P < 0.001) and pain willingness (r = 0.493, P < 0.001) specifically. Lower reports of pain were also associated with a better QoL (r = - 0.349, P = 0.002). Pain level was important in explaining QoL relating to the physical and social domains and pain-related facets assessed by the PDM. Overall, acceptance contributed to explain QoL in the level of independence and environment domains and for pain-related QoL assessed by the PDM. However, pain and acceptance only made a modest contribution to explaining psychologic and social dimensions of QoL. Discussion: The results indicate that present pain level and whether or not pain is accepted play an important role in the QoL of patients with chronic pain. Additionally, the results provide construct validity for the WHOQOL-Pain and SF-CPAQ measures, especially dimensions of pain willingness and activities engagement. The findings have implications for the way health care is delivered, particularly for the role of acceptance-based treatments for individuals with CLBP.",
author = "Mason, {V L} and B Mathias and Skevington, {S M}",
note = "ID number: ISI:000252099800005",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1097/AJP.0b013e318156d94f",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "22--29",
journal = "The Clinical Journal of Pain",
issn = "0749-8047",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accepting low back pain: Is it related to a good quality of life?

AU - Mason, V L

AU - Mathias, B

AU - Skevington, S M

N1 - ID number: ISI:000252099800005

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Objectives: Whether individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are willing to accept their pain, is of interest to pain management, but how far is the acceptance of pain related to a good quality of life (QoL)? Recently available measures now enable this question to be investigated; these are (1) the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and a revised version, here described as a short-form (SF-CPAQ), and (2) the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL)Pain, which is composed of the generic WHOQOL-100 profile (25 facets in 6 domains), and 4 additional facets within a specific pain and discomfort module (PDM). Method: Eighty-six CLBP outpatients (62.8% female, mean age 54.3 y, mean pain duration 69.4 mo) completed the CPAQ and WHOQOL-Pain, mailed 2 weeks before a pain clinic appointment. Results: General QoL was positively associated with overall acceptance of pain (CPAQ: r = 0.376, P = 0.003; SF-CPAQ: r = 0.582, P < 0.001), and with activity engagement (r = 0.455, P < 0.001) and pain willingness (r = 0.493, P < 0.001) specifically. Lower reports of pain were also associated with a better QoL (r = - 0.349, P = 0.002). Pain level was important in explaining QoL relating to the physical and social domains and pain-related facets assessed by the PDM. Overall, acceptance contributed to explain QoL in the level of independence and environment domains and for pain-related QoL assessed by the PDM. However, pain and acceptance only made a modest contribution to explaining psychologic and social dimensions of QoL. Discussion: The results indicate that present pain level and whether or not pain is accepted play an important role in the QoL of patients with chronic pain. Additionally, the results provide construct validity for the WHOQOL-Pain and SF-CPAQ measures, especially dimensions of pain willingness and activities engagement. The findings have implications for the way health care is delivered, particularly for the role of acceptance-based treatments for individuals with CLBP.

AB - Objectives: Whether individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are willing to accept their pain, is of interest to pain management, but how far is the acceptance of pain related to a good quality of life (QoL)? Recently available measures now enable this question to be investigated; these are (1) the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and a revised version, here described as a short-form (SF-CPAQ), and (2) the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL)Pain, which is composed of the generic WHOQOL-100 profile (25 facets in 6 domains), and 4 additional facets within a specific pain and discomfort module (PDM). Method: Eighty-six CLBP outpatients (62.8% female, mean age 54.3 y, mean pain duration 69.4 mo) completed the CPAQ and WHOQOL-Pain, mailed 2 weeks before a pain clinic appointment. Results: General QoL was positively associated with overall acceptance of pain (CPAQ: r = 0.376, P = 0.003; SF-CPAQ: r = 0.582, P < 0.001), and with activity engagement (r = 0.455, P < 0.001) and pain willingness (r = 0.493, P < 0.001) specifically. Lower reports of pain were also associated with a better QoL (r = - 0.349, P = 0.002). Pain level was important in explaining QoL relating to the physical and social domains and pain-related facets assessed by the PDM. Overall, acceptance contributed to explain QoL in the level of independence and environment domains and for pain-related QoL assessed by the PDM. However, pain and acceptance only made a modest contribution to explaining psychologic and social dimensions of QoL. Discussion: The results indicate that present pain level and whether or not pain is accepted play an important role in the QoL of patients with chronic pain. Additionally, the results provide construct validity for the WHOQOL-Pain and SF-CPAQ measures, especially dimensions of pain willingness and activities engagement. The findings have implications for the way health care is delivered, particularly for the role of acceptance-based treatments for individuals with CLBP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38049003265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e318156d94f

U2 - 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318156d94f

DO - 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318156d94f

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 22

EP - 29

JO - The Clinical Journal of Pain

JF - The Clinical Journal of Pain

SN - 0749-8047

IS - 1

ER -