Abstract
Over the last decade, scholars have debated the nature of military heroism. On one hand, some have argued that a new “post-heroic” culture has emerged; the U.S. military no longer awards gallantry medals for traditional heroism on the battlefield. The Medal of Honor, typically awarded for killing the enemy, now recognizes lifesaving acts. On the other hand, several scholars have argued that gallantry medals are still awarded for traditional acts of heroism; that a heroic culture endures. This article analyses contemporary military heroism. It compares U.S. Army Medal of Honor awards in the twenty-first century with those of the Second World War to interrogate the heroic/post-heroic debates. Instead, it claims that heroism has become professionalized, reflecting the values and self-identity of the all-volunteer force U.S. Army.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Armed Forces and Society |
| Early online date | 20 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Nov 2025 |
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Ori Swed and Donald Travis for the help on this paper and to the comments and criticisms of three anonymous reviewers, Ron Krebs, and Philip Smith.Keywords
- Afghanistan
- Iraq
- military culture
- professionalism/leadership
- Second World War
- U.S. Army
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Safety Research