Above and Beyond the Call of Duty: The Medal of Honor, Heroism, and Professionalism in the Twenty-First Century

Anthony King, Patrick Bury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Over the last decade, scholars have debated the nature of military heroism. On one hand, some have argued that a new “post-heroic” culture has emerged; the U.S. military no longer awards gallantry medals for traditional heroism on the battlefield. The Medal of Honor, typically awarded for killing the enemy, now recognizes lifesaving acts. On the other hand, several scholars have argued that gallantry medals are still awarded for traditional acts of heroism; that a heroic culture endures. This article analyses contemporary military heroism. It compares U.S. Army Medal of Honor awards in the twenty-first century with those of the Second World War to interrogate the heroic/post-heroic debates. Instead, it claims that heroism has become professionalized, reflecting the values and self-identity of the all-volunteer force U.S. Army.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalArmed Forces and Society
Early online date20 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2025

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ori Swed and Donald Travis for the help on this paper and to the comments and criticisms of three anonymous reviewers, Ron Krebs, and Philip Smith.

Keywords

  • Afghanistan
  • Iraq
  • military culture
  • professionalism/leadership
  • Second World War
  • U.S. Army

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Safety Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Above and Beyond the Call of Duty: The Medal of Honor, Heroism, and Professionalism in the Twenty-First Century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this