Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A systematic overview of institutions and bodies active in physical activity promotion in Europe

  • S. Kahlmeier
  • , C. Popp
  • , B. W. Martin
  • , A. Backovic-Jurican
  • , W. Banzer
  • , F. Berggren
  • , E. Engelsman
  • , C. Foster
  • , M. Koornneef
  • , J. M. Oppert
  • , F. Racioppi
  • , H. Rutter
  • , R. Slachta
  • , T. Vasankari
  • , W. van Mechelen
  • University of Zurich
  • National Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia
  • Olympic Sports Federation
  • Gerlev Physical Education and Sports Academy
  • Netherlands Institute for Sport and Physical Activity (NISB)
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, NL
  • Université Pierre et Marie Curie
  • World Health Organization
  • National Obesity Observatory
  • Palacký University Olomouc
  • UKK Institute - Centre for Health Promotion Research
  • VU University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Objectives: Growing interest in physical activity has led to the development of a number of organizations, networks and associations, including grass-root, professional and academic institutions. To maximize relevance and effectiveness of work undertaken in this field, we aimed at developing a systematic overview of institutions active in health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA). Methods: Systematic, purposive weblink-search complemented by expert input; classification by institutional type, main activity and synergy with goals of HEPA Europe, the European network for the promotion of HEPA. Results: Of 127 identified institutions, 42 met the criteria of being European and active in physical activity promotion. 45.3% were NGO/associations, 33.3% were networks, 11.9% WHO units or platforms and 9.5% bodies of the European Commission. Sport was the main topic of 28.6% institutions. Health promotion was represented with 21.4%, physical activity promotion and transport/environment with 19.0% each, disease prevention with 7.2% and nutrition with 4.8%. Seven institutions had a high synergy to HEPA Europe’s goals. Conclusions: The search identified many institutions, networks and initiatives, which 1. reflects the growing interest in and importance of physical activity for a number of stakeholders, 2. provides increased capacity to address this important topic on a European scale and 3. creates a “critical mass” to push the agenda forward into clearer and synergetic directions. Systematically mapping key players is a useful tool for institutions active in an environment with a multitude of actors to ensure that activities provide added value, to avoid duplication and to promote partnership and efficient use of resources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-18
Number of pages6
JournalSwiss Journal for Sports Medicine and Sports Traumatology
Volume62
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Physical activity, sport, public health, institutions, Europe

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic overview of institutions and bodies active in physical activity promotion in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this