A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency

Elise Pegg, B J L Kendrick, H G Pandit, H S Gill, D W Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
101 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The assessment of radiolucency around an implant is qualitative, poorly defined and has low agreement between clinicians. Accurate and repeatable assessment of radiolucency is essential to prevent misdiagnosis, minimize cases of unnecessary revision, and to correctly monitor and treat patients at risk of loosening and implant failure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether a semi-automated imaging algorithm could improve repeatability and enable quantitative assessment of radiolucency. Six surgeons assessed 38 radiographs of knees after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for radiolucency, and results were compared with assessments made by the semi-automated program. Large variation was found between the surgeon results, with total agreement in only 9.4% of zones and a kappa value of 0.602; whereas the automated program had total agreement in 81.6% of zones and a kappa value of 0.802. The software had a 'fair to excellent' prediction of the presence or the absence of radiolucency, where the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.82 on average. The software predicted radiolucency equally well for cemented and cementless implants (p = 0.996). The identification of radiolucency using an automated method is feasible and these results indicate that it could aid the definition and quantification of radiolucency.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20140303
JournalJournal of the Royal Society, Interface
Volume11
Issue number96
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Software
Imaging techniques
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Diagnostic Errors
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Knee
Surgeons

Cite this

A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency. / Pegg, Elise; Kendrick, B J L; Pandit, H G; Gill, H S; Murray, D W.

In: Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, Vol. 11, No. 96, 20140303, 06.07.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9ea1d77bab7466cbe7a333a0fdef896,
title = "A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency",
abstract = "The assessment of radiolucency around an implant is qualitative, poorly defined and has low agreement between clinicians. Accurate and repeatable assessment of radiolucency is essential to prevent misdiagnosis, minimize cases of unnecessary revision, and to correctly monitor and treat patients at risk of loosening and implant failure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether a semi-automated imaging algorithm could improve repeatability and enable quantitative assessment of radiolucency. Six surgeons assessed 38 radiographs of knees after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for radiolucency, and results were compared with assessments made by the semi-automated program. Large variation was found between the surgeon results, with total agreement in only 9.4{\%} of zones and a kappa value of 0.602; whereas the automated program had total agreement in 81.6{\%} of zones and a kappa value of 0.802. The software had a 'fair to excellent' prediction of the presence or the absence of radiolucency, where the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.82 on average. The software predicted radiolucency equally well for cemented and cementless implants (p = 0.996). The identification of radiolucency using an automated method is feasible and these results indicate that it could aid the definition and quantification of radiolucency.",
author = "Elise Pegg and Kendrick, {B J L} and Pandit, {H G} and Gill, {H S} and Murray, {D W}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1098/rsif.2014.0303",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society, Interface",
issn = "1742-5662",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "96",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency

AU - Pegg, Elise

AU - Kendrick, B J L

AU - Pandit, H G

AU - Gill, H S

AU - Murray, D W

PY - 2014/7/6

Y1 - 2014/7/6

N2 - The assessment of radiolucency around an implant is qualitative, poorly defined and has low agreement between clinicians. Accurate and repeatable assessment of radiolucency is essential to prevent misdiagnosis, minimize cases of unnecessary revision, and to correctly monitor and treat patients at risk of loosening and implant failure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether a semi-automated imaging algorithm could improve repeatability and enable quantitative assessment of radiolucency. Six surgeons assessed 38 radiographs of knees after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for radiolucency, and results were compared with assessments made by the semi-automated program. Large variation was found between the surgeon results, with total agreement in only 9.4% of zones and a kappa value of 0.602; whereas the automated program had total agreement in 81.6% of zones and a kappa value of 0.802. The software had a 'fair to excellent' prediction of the presence or the absence of radiolucency, where the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.82 on average. The software predicted radiolucency equally well for cemented and cementless implants (p = 0.996). The identification of radiolucency using an automated method is feasible and these results indicate that it could aid the definition and quantification of radiolucency.

AB - The assessment of radiolucency around an implant is qualitative, poorly defined and has low agreement between clinicians. Accurate and repeatable assessment of radiolucency is essential to prevent misdiagnosis, minimize cases of unnecessary revision, and to correctly monitor and treat patients at risk of loosening and implant failure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether a semi-automated imaging algorithm could improve repeatability and enable quantitative assessment of radiolucency. Six surgeons assessed 38 radiographs of knees after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for radiolucency, and results were compared with assessments made by the semi-automated program. Large variation was found between the surgeon results, with total agreement in only 9.4% of zones and a kappa value of 0.602; whereas the automated program had total agreement in 81.6% of zones and a kappa value of 0.802. The software had a 'fair to excellent' prediction of the presence or the absence of radiolucency, where the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.82 on average. The software predicted radiolucency equally well for cemented and cementless implants (p = 0.996). The identification of radiolucency using an automated method is feasible and these results indicate that it could aid the definition and quantification of radiolucency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901478127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0303

U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2014.0303

DO - 10.1098/rsif.2014.0303

M3 - Article

C2 - 24759544

VL - 11

JO - Journal of the Royal Society, Interface

JF - Journal of the Royal Society, Interface

SN - 1742-5662

IS - 96

M1 - 20140303

ER -