A safe space to vent: Conciliation and conflict in distributed teams

M Billings, L A Watts

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers the nature of conflict in relation to the environments within which distributed teams cooperate. Effective conflict management can bring great benefit to distributed teams, while inadequate conflict resolution strategies can impose significant personal and resource costs. The increased geographical, cognitive and emotional distances between members can stimulate and amplify conflict. Parties may display disinhibited behaviour (flaming) or may be reluctant to accept reconciliatory overtures (low trust). These factors can be attributed to the impact of communication technology on social structures that underlie interaction. Shifting to face-to-face meetings can be impractical or involve prohibitive cost, so it is important to establish how best to deal with conflict in technologically mediated settings. Dispute resolution practitioners (conciliators) have evolved strategies and techniques to construct and regulate "safe-spaces"; settings that are conducive to finding creative solutions to entrenched conflicts. Building on interviews with expert conciliators, we discuss the potential for learning from the structure and constraints of conciliation environments to improve conflict management through technologies.
LanguageEnglish
Pages139--158
Number of pages20
DOIs
StatusPublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Vents
Costs
Communication

Cite this

A safe space to vent: Conciliation and conflict in distributed teams. / Billings, M; Watts, L A.

2007. 139--158.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

@conference{2aca78b3b62948bbaa198c75e3901e80,
title = "A safe space to vent: Conciliation and conflict in distributed teams",
abstract = "This paper considers the nature of conflict in relation to the environments within which distributed teams cooperate. Effective conflict management can bring great benefit to distributed teams, while inadequate conflict resolution strategies can impose significant personal and resource costs. The increased geographical, cognitive and emotional distances between members can stimulate and amplify conflict. Parties may display disinhibited behaviour (flaming) or may be reluctant to accept reconciliatory overtures (low trust). These factors can be attributed to the impact of communication technology on social structures that underlie interaction. Shifting to face-to-face meetings can be impractical or involve prohibitive cost, so it is important to establish how best to deal with conflict in technologically mediated settings. Dispute resolution practitioners (conciliators) have evolved strategies and techniques to construct and regulate {"}safe-spaces{"}; settings that are conducive to finding creative solutions to entrenched conflicts. Building on interviews with expert conciliators, we discuss the potential for learning from the structure and constraints of conciliation environments to improve conflict management through technologies.",
author = "M Billings and Watts, {L A}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_8",
language = "English",
pages = "139----158",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - A safe space to vent: Conciliation and conflict in distributed teams

AU - Billings, M

AU - Watts, L A

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - This paper considers the nature of conflict in relation to the environments within which distributed teams cooperate. Effective conflict management can bring great benefit to distributed teams, while inadequate conflict resolution strategies can impose significant personal and resource costs. The increased geographical, cognitive and emotional distances between members can stimulate and amplify conflict. Parties may display disinhibited behaviour (flaming) or may be reluctant to accept reconciliatory overtures (low trust). These factors can be attributed to the impact of communication technology on social structures that underlie interaction. Shifting to face-to-face meetings can be impractical or involve prohibitive cost, so it is important to establish how best to deal with conflict in technologically mediated settings. Dispute resolution practitioners (conciliators) have evolved strategies and techniques to construct and regulate "safe-spaces"; settings that are conducive to finding creative solutions to entrenched conflicts. Building on interviews with expert conciliators, we discuss the potential for learning from the structure and constraints of conciliation environments to improve conflict management through technologies.

AB - This paper considers the nature of conflict in relation to the environments within which distributed teams cooperate. Effective conflict management can bring great benefit to distributed teams, while inadequate conflict resolution strategies can impose significant personal and resource costs. The increased geographical, cognitive and emotional distances between members can stimulate and amplify conflict. Parties may display disinhibited behaviour (flaming) or may be reluctant to accept reconciliatory overtures (low trust). These factors can be attributed to the impact of communication technology on social structures that underlie interaction. Shifting to face-to-face meetings can be impractical or involve prohibitive cost, so it is important to establish how best to deal with conflict in technologically mediated settings. Dispute resolution practitioners (conciliators) have evolved strategies and techniques to construct and regulate "safe-spaces"; settings that are conducive to finding creative solutions to entrenched conflicts. Building on interviews with expert conciliators, we discuss the potential for learning from the structure and constraints of conciliation environments to improve conflict management through technologies.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_8

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_8

DO - 10.1007/978-1-84800-031-5_8

M3 - Paper

SP - 139

EP - 158

ER -