A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: implications for policy

Anna B. Gilmore, Gary Fooks, Martin McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40% of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies. This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)621-642
Number of pages12
JournalGlobal Public Health : An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume6
Issue number6
Early online date26 Jul 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Privatization
Tobacco Industry
Tobacco Products
Smoking
Tobacco
Holidays
Ownership
Marketing
Economics
Pressure

Cite this

A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: implications for policy. / Gilmore, Anna B.; Fooks, Gary; McKee, Martin.

In: Global Public Health : An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, Vol. 6, No. 6, 09.2011, p. 621-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{778325980244419e872ae23f37ef5245,
title = "A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: implications for policy",
abstract = "State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40{\%} of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies. This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.",
author = "Gilmore, {Anna B.} and Gary Fooks and Martin McKee",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/17441692.2011.595727",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "621--642",
journal = "Global Public Health : An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice",
issn = "1744-1692",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: implications for policy

AU - Gilmore, Anna B.

AU - Fooks, Gary

AU - McKee, Martin

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40% of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies. This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.

AB - State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40% of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies. This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960965298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2011.595727

U2 - 10.1080/17441692.2011.595727

DO - 10.1080/17441692.2011.595727

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 621

EP - 642

JO - Global Public Health : An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice

JF - Global Public Health : An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice

SN - 1744-1692

IS - 6

ER -