A practical guide to the recovery of wavelet coefficients from Fourier measurements

Milana Gataric, Clarice Poon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a series of recent papers [B. Adcock, A. C. Hansen, and C. Poon, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 36 (2014), pp. 387--415; B. Adcock, M. Gataric, and A. C. Hansen, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7 (2014), pp. 1690--1723; Adcock et al., SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), pp. 1196--1233], it was shown that one can optimally recover the wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from pointwise evaluations of its Fourier transform via the method of generalized sampling. While these papers focused on the optimality of generalized sampling in terms of its stability and error bounds, the current paper explains how this optimal method can be implemented to yield a computationally efficient algorithm. In particular, we show that generalized sampling has a computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}\left(M(N)\log N\right)$ when recovering the first $N$ boundary-corrected wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from $M(N)$ Fourier samples. Therefore, due to the linear correspondences between the number of samples $M$ and the number of coefficients $N$ shown previously, generalized sampling offers a computationally optimal way of recovering wavelet coefficients from Fourier data.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)A1075-A1099
JournalSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date12 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Apr 2016

Cite this

A practical guide to the recovery of wavelet coefficients from Fourier measurements. / Gataric, Milana; Poon, Clarice.

In: SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 38, No. 2, 12.04.2016, p. A1075-A1099.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4d5d45aa42f42db84e16aee5283be39,
title = "A practical guide to the recovery of wavelet coefficients from Fourier measurements",
abstract = "In a series of recent papers [B. Adcock, A. C. Hansen, and C. Poon, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 36 (2014), pp. 387--415; B. Adcock, M. Gataric, and A. C. Hansen, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7 (2014), pp. 1690--1723; Adcock et al., SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), pp. 1196--1233], it was shown that one can optimally recover the wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from pointwise evaluations of its Fourier transform via the method of generalized sampling. While these papers focused on the optimality of generalized sampling in terms of its stability and error bounds, the current paper explains how this optimal method can be implemented to yield a computationally efficient algorithm. In particular, we show that generalized sampling has a computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}\left(M(N)\log N\right)$ when recovering the first $N$ boundary-corrected wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from $M(N)$ Fourier samples. Therefore, due to the linear correspondences between the number of samples $M$ and the number of coefficients $N$ shown previously, generalized sampling offers a computationally optimal way of recovering wavelet coefficients from Fourier data.",
author = "Milana Gataric and Clarice Poon",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1137/15M1018630",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "A1075--A1099",
journal = "SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing",
issn = "1064-8275",
publisher = "SIAM",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A practical guide to the recovery of wavelet coefficients from Fourier measurements

AU - Gataric, Milana

AU - Poon, Clarice

PY - 2016/4/12

Y1 - 2016/4/12

N2 - In a series of recent papers [B. Adcock, A. C. Hansen, and C. Poon, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 36 (2014), pp. 387--415; B. Adcock, M. Gataric, and A. C. Hansen, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7 (2014), pp. 1690--1723; Adcock et al., SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), pp. 1196--1233], it was shown that one can optimally recover the wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from pointwise evaluations of its Fourier transform via the method of generalized sampling. While these papers focused on the optimality of generalized sampling in terms of its stability and error bounds, the current paper explains how this optimal method can be implemented to yield a computationally efficient algorithm. In particular, we show that generalized sampling has a computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}\left(M(N)\log N\right)$ when recovering the first $N$ boundary-corrected wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from $M(N)$ Fourier samples. Therefore, due to the linear correspondences between the number of samples $M$ and the number of coefficients $N$ shown previously, generalized sampling offers a computationally optimal way of recovering wavelet coefficients from Fourier data.

AB - In a series of recent papers [B. Adcock, A. C. Hansen, and C. Poon, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 36 (2014), pp. 387--415; B. Adcock, M. Gataric, and A. C. Hansen, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7 (2014), pp. 1690--1723; Adcock et al., SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), pp. 1196--1233], it was shown that one can optimally recover the wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from pointwise evaluations of its Fourier transform via the method of generalized sampling. While these papers focused on the optimality of generalized sampling in terms of its stability and error bounds, the current paper explains how this optimal method can be implemented to yield a computationally efficient algorithm. In particular, we show that generalized sampling has a computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}\left(M(N)\log N\right)$ when recovering the first $N$ boundary-corrected wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from $M(N)$ Fourier samples. Therefore, due to the linear correspondences between the number of samples $M$ and the number of coefficients $N$ shown previously, generalized sampling offers a computationally optimal way of recovering wavelet coefficients from Fourier data.

U2 - 10.1137/15M1018630

DO - 10.1137/15M1018630

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - A1075-A1099

JO - SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

JF - SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

SN - 1064-8275

IS - 2

ER -