Abstract
Objective: Delivery is one of the most common ways of assessing fidelity in behavioral interventions.
However, there is a lack of research reporting on how well an intervention protocol reflects its proposed theoretical principles (design fidelity). This study presents a systematic method for assessing design fidelity and applies it to the eMotion web-based intervention targeting physical activity and depression.
Method: The eMotion intervention comprises of 13 web-based modules, designed according to an underlying intervention map. An independent rater with expertise in behavior change coded the presenceor absence of behavior change techniques (BCTs) in the content of eMotion. Results of coding werecompared to the intervention designers’ a priori specification for interrater reliability. Results: Afterdiscussion, the independent rater and the intervention designer had a high agreement for the presence ofBCTs relating to behavioral activation (AC1 0.91) with “demonstration of behavior” and “monitoringof emotional consequences” having the lowest agreement (AC1 0.4). There was also high agreement
for the presence of BCTs targeting physical activity (AC1 0.88) with “demonstration of behavior” and “monitoring of emotional consequences” having the lowest agreement (AC1 0.4). The eMotion description was then amended to align the interrater agreement. Conclusions: This study presents a novel
method for assessing design fidelity. Developers of behavioral (and other multicomponent) interventions are encouraged to develop and refine this method and assess design fidelity in future interventions to ensure BCTs are operationalized as intended.
However, there is a lack of research reporting on how well an intervention protocol reflects its proposed theoretical principles (design fidelity). This study presents a systematic method for assessing design fidelity and applies it to the eMotion web-based intervention targeting physical activity and depression.
Method: The eMotion intervention comprises of 13 web-based modules, designed according to an underlying intervention map. An independent rater with expertise in behavior change coded the presenceor absence of behavior change techniques (BCTs) in the content of eMotion. Results of coding werecompared to the intervention designers’ a priori specification for interrater reliability. Results: Afterdiscussion, the independent rater and the intervention designer had a high agreement for the presence ofBCTs relating to behavioral activation (AC1 0.91) with “demonstration of behavior” and “monitoringof emotional consequences” having the lowest agreement (AC1 0.4). There was also high agreement
for the presence of BCTs targeting physical activity (AC1 0.88) with “demonstration of behavior” and “monitoring of emotional consequences” having the lowest agreement (AC1 0.4). The eMotion description was then amended to align the interrater agreement. Conclusions: This study presents a novel
method for assessing design fidelity. Developers of behavioral (and other multicomponent) interventions are encouraged to develop and refine this method and assess design fidelity in future interventions to ensure BCTs are operationalized as intended.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 217-225 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Health Psychology |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2021 |
Keywords
- Behavior Therapy/methods
- Exercise
- Humans
- Internet-Based Intervention
- Reproducibility of Results
- Research Design