A new way to look at the data: Similarities between groups of people are large and important

Paul Hanel, Gregory Maio, Antony SR Manstead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social variables (e.g., moral attitudes, human values, and trust) within 6 commonly used social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between 2 groups (e.g., high vs. low educated or different countries) was greater than 90%. Even large effect sizes revealed more similarities than differences between groups. Studies 2-5 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about similarity in research reports. Compared with the typical presentation of differences (e.g., barplots with confidence intervals), similarity information led to more accurate lay perceptions and to more positive attitudes toward an outgroup. Barplots with a restricted y-axis led to a gross underestimation of similarities (i.e., a gross overestimation of the differences), and information about similarities was rated as more comprehensible. Overall, the presentation of similarity information achieves more balanced scientific communication and may help address the file drawer problem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-562
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume116
Issue number4
Early online date31 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural
  • Differences
  • Education
  • Gender
  • Similarities
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Thinking
  • Male
  • Psychology, Social
  • Research
  • Group Processes
  • Adult
  • Female

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A new way to look at the data: Similarities between groups of people are large and important. / Hanel, Paul; Maio, Gregory; Manstead, Antony SR.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 116, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 541-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c8e923f5e2714e7bbf0fa3f5194d4b32,
title = "A new way to look at the data: Similarities between groups of people are large and important",
abstract = "Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social variables (e.g., moral attitudes, human values, and trust) within 6 commonly used social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between 2 groups (e.g., high vs. low educated or different countries) was greater than 90{\%}. Even large effect sizes revealed more similarities than differences between groups. Studies 2-5 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about similarity in research reports. Compared with the typical presentation of differences (e.g., barplots with confidence intervals), similarity information led to more accurate lay perceptions and to more positive attitudes toward an outgroup. Barplots with a restricted y-axis led to a gross underestimation of similarities (i.e., a gross overestimation of the differences), and information about similarities was rated as more comprehensible. Overall, the presentation of similarity information achieves more balanced scientific communication and may help address the file drawer problem.",
keywords = "Cross-cultural, Differences, Education, Gender, Similarities, Humans, Middle Aged, Thinking, Male, Psychology, Social, Research, Group Processes, Adult, Female",
author = "Paul Hanel and Gregory Maio and Manstead, {Antony SR}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pspi0000154",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "541--562",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new way to look at the data: Similarities between groups of people are large and important

AU - Hanel, Paul

AU - Maio, Gregory

AU - Manstead, Antony SR

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social variables (e.g., moral attitudes, human values, and trust) within 6 commonly used social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between 2 groups (e.g., high vs. low educated or different countries) was greater than 90%. Even large effect sizes revealed more similarities than differences between groups. Studies 2-5 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about similarity in research reports. Compared with the typical presentation of differences (e.g., barplots with confidence intervals), similarity information led to more accurate lay perceptions and to more positive attitudes toward an outgroup. Barplots with a restricted y-axis led to a gross underestimation of similarities (i.e., a gross overestimation of the differences), and information about similarities was rated as more comprehensible. Overall, the presentation of similarity information achieves more balanced scientific communication and may help address the file drawer problem.

AB - Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social variables (e.g., moral attitudes, human values, and trust) within 6 commonly used social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between 2 groups (e.g., high vs. low educated or different countries) was greater than 90%. Even large effect sizes revealed more similarities than differences between groups. Studies 2-5 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about similarity in research reports. Compared with the typical presentation of differences (e.g., barplots with confidence intervals), similarity information led to more accurate lay perceptions and to more positive attitudes toward an outgroup. Barplots with a restricted y-axis led to a gross underestimation of similarities (i.e., a gross overestimation of the differences), and information about similarities was rated as more comprehensible. Overall, the presentation of similarity information achieves more balanced scientific communication and may help address the file drawer problem.

KW - Cross-cultural

KW - Differences

KW - Education

KW - Gender

KW - Similarities

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Thinking

KW - Male

KW - Psychology, Social

KW - Research

KW - Group Processes

KW - Adult

KW - Female

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049734139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pspi0000154

DO - 10.1037/pspi0000154

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 541

EP - 562

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 4

ER -