A new dual earthquake and submarine landslide source model for the 28 September 2018 Palu (Sulawesi), Indonesia tsunami

Mohammad Heidarzadeh, Iyan E. Mulia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (SciVal)
48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The September 2018 Palu (Sulawesi, Indonesia) tsunami has been a heavily debated event because multiple source models of three different types have been proposed for this tsunami: (i) The M w 7.5 earthquake, (ii) landslides, and (iii) dual earthquake and landslide. Surprisingly, all of these three types of models were reported as being successful in the literature in terms of reproducing the existing tsunami observations. This can be partly attributed to the limited observations available for this tsunami. This study is motivated by the results of a marine bathymetric survey, which identified evidence for submarine landslides within the Palu Bay. Our modeling shows that the tsunami cannot be exclusively attributed to the M w 7.5 earthquake. Inspired by the results of the marine survey, we propose a dual source model including a submarine landslide although most of the existing models include subaerial coastal landslides. Our dual model comprises an earthquake model, which has a length of 264 km, a width of 37 km, and a slip of 0–8.5 m, combined with a submarine landslide with a length of 1.0 km, a width of 2.0 km, and a thickness of 80.0 m located at 119.823°E and −0.792°S.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-109
JournalCoastal Engineering Journal
Volume65
Issue number1
Early online date19 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Earthquake
  • Numerical modeling
  • Palu
  • Submarine landslide
  • Tsunami

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Ocean Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A new dual earthquake and submarine landslide source model for the 28 September 2018 Palu (Sulawesi), Indonesia tsunami'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this