Abstract
Calls for new metrics, technical standards, and governance mechanisms to guide and evaluate the adoption of ethical Artificial Intelligence (AI) in institutions are now commonplace. Yet, most research and policy efforts do not fully account for all the different approaches and issues potentially relevant to the institutional adoption of AI. In this position paper, we contend that this omission stems, in part, from what we call the ‘relational problem’: the persistence of differing value-based terminologies to categorize and assess institutional AI systems, and the prevalence of conceptual isolation in the fields that study them including ML, human factors, and social science. After developing this critique, we propose a basic ontological framework to bridge ideas across fields—consisting of three horizontal, discipline-agnostic domains for organizing foundational concepts into themes: Operational, Epistemic, and Normative.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
Volume | 3442 |
Publication status | Published - 9 Jun 2023 |
Event | 2nd European Workshop on Algorithmic Fairness, EWAF 2023 - Winterthur, Switzerland Duration: 7 Jun 2023 → 9 Jun 2023 |
Keywords
- conceptual framework
- institutions
- Multidomain approach to AI
- socio-technical topics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science