A mixture of "cheats" and "co-operators" can enable maximal group benefit

R C MacLean, A Fuentes-Hernandez, D Greig, Laurence D Hurst, I Gudelj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is a group best off if everyone co-operates? Theory often considers this to be so (e. g. the "conspiracy of doves''), this understanding underpinning social and economic policy. We observe, however, that after competition between "cheat'' and "co-operator'' strains of yeast, population fitness is maximized under co-existence. To address whether this might just be a peculiarity of our experimental system or a result with broader applicability, we assemble, benchmark, dissect, and test a systems model. This reveals the conditions necessary to recover the unexpected result. These are 3-fold: (a) that resources are used inefficiently when they are abundant, (b) that the amount of co-operation needed cannot be accurately assessed, and (c) the population is structured, such that co-operators receive more of the resource than the cheats. Relaxing any of the assumptions can lead to population fitness being maximized when cheats are absent, which we experimentally demonstrate. These three conditions will often be relevant, and hence in order to understand the trajectory of social interactions, understanding the dynamics of the efficiency of resource utilization and accuracy of information will be necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1000486
JournalPLoS Biology
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

operator regions
Yeast
Trajectories
Economics
Population
economic policy
Benchmarking
doves
public policy
Columbidae
Public Policy
Interpersonal Relations
trajectories
Yeasts
yeasts
testing

Cite this

A mixture of "cheats" and "co-operators" can enable maximal group benefit. / MacLean, R C; Fuentes-Hernandez, A; Greig, D; Hurst, Laurence D; Gudelj, I.

In: PLoS Biology, Vol. 8, No. 9, e1000486, 09.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacLean, R C ; Fuentes-Hernandez, A ; Greig, D ; Hurst, Laurence D ; Gudelj, I. / A mixture of "cheats" and "co-operators" can enable maximal group benefit. In: PLoS Biology. 2010 ; Vol. 8, No. 9.
@article{f73b810af75943159681b283eecf75bd,
title = "A mixture of {"}cheats{"} and {"}co-operators{"} can enable maximal group benefit",
abstract = "Is a group best off if everyone co-operates? Theory often considers this to be so (e. g. the {"}conspiracy of doves''), this understanding underpinning social and economic policy. We observe, however, that after competition between {"}cheat'' and {"}co-operator'' strains of yeast, population fitness is maximized under co-existence. To address whether this might just be a peculiarity of our experimental system or a result with broader applicability, we assemble, benchmark, dissect, and test a systems model. This reveals the conditions necessary to recover the unexpected result. These are 3-fold: (a) that resources are used inefficiently when they are abundant, (b) that the amount of co-operation needed cannot be accurately assessed, and (c) the population is structured, such that co-operators receive more of the resource than the cheats. Relaxing any of the assumptions can lead to population fitness being maximized when cheats are absent, which we experimentally demonstrate. These three conditions will often be relevant, and hence in order to understand the trajectory of social interactions, understanding the dynamics of the efficiency of resource utilization and accuracy of information will be necessary.",
author = "MacLean, {R C} and A Fuentes-Hernandez and D Greig and Hurst, {Laurence D} and I Gudelj",
note = "MacLean, R. Craig Fuentes-Hernandez, Ayari Greig, Duncan Hurst, Laurence D. Gudelj, Ivana",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pbio.1000486",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLOS Biology",
issn = "1545-7885",
publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLOS)",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A mixture of "cheats" and "co-operators" can enable maximal group benefit

AU - MacLean, R C

AU - Fuentes-Hernandez, A

AU - Greig, D

AU - Hurst, Laurence D

AU - Gudelj, I

N1 - MacLean, R. Craig Fuentes-Hernandez, Ayari Greig, Duncan Hurst, Laurence D. Gudelj, Ivana

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Is a group best off if everyone co-operates? Theory often considers this to be so (e. g. the "conspiracy of doves''), this understanding underpinning social and economic policy. We observe, however, that after competition between "cheat'' and "co-operator'' strains of yeast, population fitness is maximized under co-existence. To address whether this might just be a peculiarity of our experimental system or a result with broader applicability, we assemble, benchmark, dissect, and test a systems model. This reveals the conditions necessary to recover the unexpected result. These are 3-fold: (a) that resources are used inefficiently when they are abundant, (b) that the amount of co-operation needed cannot be accurately assessed, and (c) the population is structured, such that co-operators receive more of the resource than the cheats. Relaxing any of the assumptions can lead to population fitness being maximized when cheats are absent, which we experimentally demonstrate. These three conditions will often be relevant, and hence in order to understand the trajectory of social interactions, understanding the dynamics of the efficiency of resource utilization and accuracy of information will be necessary.

AB - Is a group best off if everyone co-operates? Theory often considers this to be so (e. g. the "conspiracy of doves''), this understanding underpinning social and economic policy. We observe, however, that after competition between "cheat'' and "co-operator'' strains of yeast, population fitness is maximized under co-existence. To address whether this might just be a peculiarity of our experimental system or a result with broader applicability, we assemble, benchmark, dissect, and test a systems model. This reveals the conditions necessary to recover the unexpected result. These are 3-fold: (a) that resources are used inefficiently when they are abundant, (b) that the amount of co-operation needed cannot be accurately assessed, and (c) the population is structured, such that co-operators receive more of the resource than the cheats. Relaxing any of the assumptions can lead to population fitness being maximized when cheats are absent, which we experimentally demonstrate. These three conditions will often be relevant, and hence in order to understand the trajectory of social interactions, understanding the dynamics of the efficiency of resource utilization and accuracy of information will be necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957911043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000486

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000486

DO - 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000486

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - PLOS Biology

JF - PLOS Biology

SN - 1545-7885

IS - 9

M1 - e1000486

ER -