A Mixed-Methods Stress Audit with Midwives in the United Kingdom

Zoe G. Anchors, Lee J. Moore, Sara D. Burnard, Catherine A. Bressington, Annette E. Moreton, Rachel Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Problem
UK midwives report high work-related stress, which can negatively impact their health and wellbeing, with many considering leaving the profession.

Background
An occupational stress audit guides the implementation of stress management intervention, by identifying which stressors have the most negative impact and why, and highlighting “at risk” groups.

Aim
To conduct a concurrent mixed-methods stress audit with UK midwives in an NHS Trust.

Methods
Seventy-one midwives (Mage = 39 years, SD = 11) completed a survey assessing stressors (e.g., relationships), stress appraisals (i.e., challenge vs. threat), coping strategies (e.g., avoidance-focused), and outcomes (i.e., mental health, performance, and intention to leave). Ten midwives (Mage = 42 years, SD = 10) participated in semi-structured interviews.

Findings
Quantitative data revealed that more work-related demands, poorer peer support and relationships, and threat appraisals predicted worse mental health. Moreover, less control and more work-related demands predicted poorer performance, while less control, poorer manager support, more change-related demands, and threat appraisals predicted greater intention to leave. Qualitative data generated three themes: organisational pressures exacerbated by unexpected changes; individualised responses but largely debilitative emotions; and personal coping and power of social support.

Discussion and conclusion
This study offered a comprehensive and novel insight into the stress experiences of UK midwives, highlighting targets for future stress management interventions, including key stressors (e.g., manager support), underlying mechanisms (e.g., stress appraisals), and “at-risk” groups (e.g., night shift workers). Practical recommendations are provided for stakeholders operating at multiple levels (e.g., midwife, trust, policy) to better support midwives with work-related stress.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101639
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume37
Issue number5
Early online date4 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Jul 2024

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Lisa Austin, Research Hub Manager at the University of Bath, who was involved in the design, costing, and writing for the funding application.

Funding

This project was funded by NIHR Research Capability Funding (RCF) from the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, awarded to Dr Rachel Arnold and Dr Lee Moore.

FundersFunder number
National Institute for Health Research
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust
Dr Lee Moore

Keywords

  • Coping
  • Healthcare
  • Intervention
  • Pressure
  • Stressor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Mixed-Methods Stress Audit with Midwives in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this