Abstract
Problem
UK midwives report high work-related stress, which can negatively impact their health and wellbeing, with many considering leaving the profession.
Background
An occupational stress audit guides the implementation of stress management intervention, by identifying which stressors have the most negative impact and why, and highlighting “at risk” groups.
Aim
To conduct a concurrent mixed-methods stress audit with UK midwives in an NHS Trust.
Methods
Seventy-one midwives (Mage = 39 years, SD = 11) completed a survey assessing stressors (e.g., relationships), stress appraisals (i.e., challenge vs. threat), coping strategies (e.g., avoidance-focused), and outcomes (i.e., mental health, performance, and intention to leave). Ten midwives (Mage = 42 years, SD = 10) participated in semi-structured interviews.
Findings
Quantitative data revealed that more work-related demands, poorer peer support and relationships, and threat appraisals predicted worse mental health. Moreover, less control and more work-related demands predicted poorer performance, while less control, poorer manager support, more change-related demands, and threat appraisals predicted greater intention to leave. Qualitative data generated three themes: organisational pressures exacerbated by unexpected changes; individualised responses but largely debilitative emotions; and personal coping and power of social support.
Discussion and conclusion
This study offered a comprehensive and novel insight into the stress experiences of UK midwives, highlighting targets for future stress management interventions, including key stressors (e.g., manager support), underlying mechanisms (e.g., stress appraisals), and “at-risk” groups (e.g., night shift workers). Practical recommendations are provided for stakeholders operating at multiple levels (e.g., midwife, trust, policy) to better support midwives with work-related stress.
UK midwives report high work-related stress, which can negatively impact their health and wellbeing, with many considering leaving the profession.
Background
An occupational stress audit guides the implementation of stress management intervention, by identifying which stressors have the most negative impact and why, and highlighting “at risk” groups.
Aim
To conduct a concurrent mixed-methods stress audit with UK midwives in an NHS Trust.
Methods
Seventy-one midwives (Mage = 39 years, SD = 11) completed a survey assessing stressors (e.g., relationships), stress appraisals (i.e., challenge vs. threat), coping strategies (e.g., avoidance-focused), and outcomes (i.e., mental health, performance, and intention to leave). Ten midwives (Mage = 42 years, SD = 10) participated in semi-structured interviews.
Findings
Quantitative data revealed that more work-related demands, poorer peer support and relationships, and threat appraisals predicted worse mental health. Moreover, less control and more work-related demands predicted poorer performance, while less control, poorer manager support, more change-related demands, and threat appraisals predicted greater intention to leave. Qualitative data generated three themes: organisational pressures exacerbated by unexpected changes; individualised responses but largely debilitative emotions; and personal coping and power of social support.
Discussion and conclusion
This study offered a comprehensive and novel insight into the stress experiences of UK midwives, highlighting targets for future stress management interventions, including key stressors (e.g., manager support), underlying mechanisms (e.g., stress appraisals), and “at-risk” groups (e.g., night shift workers). Practical recommendations are provided for stakeholders operating at multiple levels (e.g., midwife, trust, policy) to better support midwives with work-related stress.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101639 |
Journal | Women and Birth |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 4 Jul 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 4 Jul 2024 |
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Lisa Austin, Research Hub Manager at the University of Bath, who was involved in the design, costing, and writing for the funding application.Funding
This project was funded by NIHR Research Capability Funding (RCF) from the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, awarded to Dr Rachel Arnold and Dr Lee Moore.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Institute for Health Research | |
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust | |
Dr Lee Moore |
Keywords
- Coping
- Healthcare
- Intervention
- Pressure
- Stressor
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Maternity and Midwifery