Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Frontiers in Political Science |
Volume | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Sept 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding: This work was funded by a grant to LS from Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust (No. 5469).Funding
Finally, the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) have a $77 million budget in comparison to the BWC which has only $686.69 thousand (OPCW, ; United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, ), meaning that the BWC cannot afford to be interacting outside of this financial framework, in order to learn institutional aspects of the CWC that could be applicable to the BWC. This problem is also felt within the opportunities provided by the BWC for biosecurity and safety. For example, the BWC offers a fellowship program but out of the 800 applications, only 20 places where available for funding (pers. comm. 28/04/2023 & Shang et al., ). Overall, there are many institutional barriers worth considering within the BWC that are not immediately obvious.