TY - JOUR
T1 - A home for all within planetary boundaries
T2 - Pathways for meeting England's housing needs without transgressing national climate and biodiversity goals
AU - zu Ermgassen, Sophus O.S.E.
AU - Drewniok, Michal P.
AU - Bull, Joseph W.
AU - Corlet Walker, Christine M.
AU - Mancini, Mattia
AU - Ryan-Collins, Josh
AU - Cabrera Serrenho, André
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for discussions with Michael Müller, Ben Gallant, Beth Stratford and Ian Mulheirn during early stages of the project, and to Felix Eigenbrod for sharing the urbanisation scenario. S.O.S.E.z.E. was supported through NERC's EnvEast Doctoral Training Partnership [grant NE/ L002582 /1]. M.P.D. and A.C.S. were supported by EPSRC programme grant ‘UKFIRES’ [EP/ S019111 /1]. M.P.D. was additionally supported by EPSRC grant `TransFIRe’ [EP/ V054627 /1]. C.M.C.W. was supported by the ESRC [grant ES/ P00072 /X].
PY - 2022/11/30
Y1 - 2022/11/30
N2 - Secure housing is core to the Sustainable Development Goals and a fundamental human right. However, potential conflicts between housing and sustainability objectives remain under-researched. We explore the impact of current English government housing policy, and alternative housing strategies, on national carbon and biodiversity goals. Using material flow and land use change/biodiversity models, we estimate from 2022 to 2050 under current policy housing alone would consume 104% of England's cumulative carbon budget (2.6/2.5Gt [50% chance of < 1.5 °C]); 12% from the construction and operation of newbuilds and 92% from the existing stock. Housing expansion also potentially conflicts with England's biodiversity targets. However, meeting greater housing need without rapid housing expansion is theoretically possible. We review solutions including improving affordability by reducing demand for homes as financial assets, macroprudential policy, expanding social housing, and reducing underutilisation of floor-space. Transitioning to housing strategies which slow housing expansion and accelerate low-carbon retrofits would achieve lower emissions, but we show that they face an unfavourable political economy and structural economic barriers.
AB - Secure housing is core to the Sustainable Development Goals and a fundamental human right. However, potential conflicts between housing and sustainability objectives remain under-researched. We explore the impact of current English government housing policy, and alternative housing strategies, on national carbon and biodiversity goals. Using material flow and land use change/biodiversity models, we estimate from 2022 to 2050 under current policy housing alone would consume 104% of England's cumulative carbon budget (2.6/2.5Gt [50% chance of < 1.5 °C]); 12% from the construction and operation of newbuilds and 92% from the existing stock. Housing expansion also potentially conflicts with England's biodiversity targets. However, meeting greater housing need without rapid housing expansion is theoretically possible. We review solutions including improving affordability by reducing demand for homes as financial assets, macroprudential policy, expanding social housing, and reducing underutilisation of floor-space. Transitioning to housing strategies which slow housing expansion and accelerate low-carbon retrofits would achieve lower emissions, but we show that they face an unfavourable political economy and structural economic barriers.
KW - Biodiversity Net Gain
KW - Financialization of Housing
KW - Growth-Dependence
KW - Infrastructure Sustainability
KW - Material Flow Analysis
KW - Net Zero
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137286751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107562
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107562
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137286751
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 201
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
M1 - 107562
ER -