A graphical foundation for schedules

Guy McCusker, John Power, Cai Wingfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (SciVal)
146 Downloads (Pure)


In 2007, Harmer, Hyland and Melli`s gave a formal mathematical foundation for game semantics using a notion they called a schedule. Their definition was combinatorial in nature, but researchers often draw pictures when describing schedules in practice. Moreover, a proof that the composition of schedules is associative involves cumbersome combinatorial detail, whereas in terms of pictures the proof is straightforward, reflecting the geometry of the plane. Here, we give a geometric formulation of schedule, prove that it is equivalent to Harmer et al.’s definition, and illustrate its value by giving a proof of associativity of composition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-289
Number of pages16
JournalElectronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sept 2012

Bibliographical note

Proceedings of the 28th Conference on the Mathematical Foundations of Programming Semantics (MFPS XXVIII)


Dive into the research topics of 'A graphical foundation for schedules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this