A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK

Hanna Hottenrott, Cornelia Lawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

This study sheds light on the unexplored phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations using scientific publications. Institutional affiliations are important in the organisation and governance of science. Multiple affiliations may alter the traditional framework of academic employment and careers and may require a reappraisal of institutional assessment based on research outcomes of affiliated staff. Results for authors in three major science and technology nations (Germany, Japan and the UK) and in three fields (biology, chemistry, and engineering) show that multiple affiliations have at least doubled over the past few years. The analysis proposes three major types of multiple affiliations that depend on the structure of the research sector and its international openness. Highly internationalised and higher education-centred affiliations are most common for researchers in the UK whereas Germany and Japan have stronger cross-sector affiliation patterns. International multiple affiliations are, however, still more common in Germany compared to Japan which is characterised by a domestic, cross-sector affiliation distribution. Moreover, multiple affiliation authors are more often found on high impact papers, particularly in the case of authors from Japan and Germany in the fields of biology and chemistry.
LanguageEnglish
Pages285-295
JournalScientometrics
Volume111
Issue number1
Early online date28 Jan 2017
DOIs
StatusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Japan
biology
chemistry
Education
science
career
governance
engineering
staff
education

Cite this

A first look at multiple institutional affiliations : a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK. / Hottenrott, Hanna; Lawson, Cornelia.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 111, No. 1, 04.2017, p. 285-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3cae76d8f6c431cb3d013e9b247ad30,
title = "A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK",
abstract = "This study sheds light on the unexplored phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations using scientific publications. Institutional affiliations are important in the organisation and governance of science. Multiple affiliations may alter the traditional framework of academic employment and careers and may require a reappraisal of institutional assessment based on research outcomes of affiliated staff. Results for authors in three major science and technology nations (Germany, Japan and the UK) and in three fields (biology, chemistry, and engineering) show that multiple affiliations have at least doubled over the past few years. The analysis proposes three major types of multiple affiliations that depend on the structure of the research sector and its international openness. Highly internationalised and higher education-centred affiliations are most common for researchers in the UK whereas Germany and Japan have stronger cross-sector affiliation patterns. International multiple affiliations are, however, still more common in Germany compared to Japan which is characterised by a domestic, cross-sector affiliation distribution. Moreover, multiple affiliation authors are more often found on high impact papers, particularly in the case of authors from Japan and Germany in the fields of biology and chemistry.",
author = "Hanna Hottenrott and Cornelia Lawson",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "285--295",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A first look at multiple institutional affiliations

T2 - Scientometrics

AU - Hottenrott, Hanna

AU - Lawson, Cornelia

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - This study sheds light on the unexplored phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations using scientific publications. Institutional affiliations are important in the organisation and governance of science. Multiple affiliations may alter the traditional framework of academic employment and careers and may require a reappraisal of institutional assessment based on research outcomes of affiliated staff. Results for authors in three major science and technology nations (Germany, Japan and the UK) and in three fields (biology, chemistry, and engineering) show that multiple affiliations have at least doubled over the past few years. The analysis proposes three major types of multiple affiliations that depend on the structure of the research sector and its international openness. Highly internationalised and higher education-centred affiliations are most common for researchers in the UK whereas Germany and Japan have stronger cross-sector affiliation patterns. International multiple affiliations are, however, still more common in Germany compared to Japan which is characterised by a domestic, cross-sector affiliation distribution. Moreover, multiple affiliation authors are more often found on high impact papers, particularly in the case of authors from Japan and Germany in the fields of biology and chemistry.

AB - This study sheds light on the unexplored phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations using scientific publications. Institutional affiliations are important in the organisation and governance of science. Multiple affiliations may alter the traditional framework of academic employment and careers and may require a reappraisal of institutional assessment based on research outcomes of affiliated staff. Results for authors in three major science and technology nations (Germany, Japan and the UK) and in three fields (biology, chemistry, and engineering) show that multiple affiliations have at least doubled over the past few years. The analysis proposes three major types of multiple affiliations that depend on the structure of the research sector and its international openness. Highly internationalised and higher education-centred affiliations are most common for researchers in the UK whereas Germany and Japan have stronger cross-sector affiliation patterns. International multiple affiliations are, however, still more common in Germany compared to Japan which is characterised by a domestic, cross-sector affiliation distribution. Moreover, multiple affiliation authors are more often found on high impact papers, particularly in the case of authors from Japan and Germany in the fields of biology and chemistry.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6

DO - 10.1007/s11192-017-2257-6

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 285

EP - 295

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 1

ER -