A critical theory of hope

critical affirmations beyond fear

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Dinerstein re-evaluates the place of the theoretical and of critical theory in today’s praxis. By pointing to the sphere of social reproduction as the ‘site’ of both new forms of class struggle and the renewal of critical theory, Dinerstein argues that critical theory today should be based on Bloch’s philosophy of hope. Despite the critical theorist’s fear of the positivisation of social struggles, Dinerstein argues that the fight against Barbarism is not only possible but already exists in the form of struggles for alternative forms of life. In a context of crisis of the social reproduction, these struggles cannot not be regarded as positive: they are critical affirmations that affirm life as a form of negating a totality of destruction in a ‘contradictory’ manner (see Gun 1994). To her, while Adorno’s negative dialectics remarkably prevents dialectical closure of the capitalist totality from taking place theoretically, negative dialectics cannot open onto a ‘world with Front’ in practice. And this is what is needed today.

Keywords: Adorno, critical affirmation, Bloch, concrete utopia, hope, negation, social reproduction struggles, world with a front, positivisation
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOpen Marxism against a closing world
Subtitle of host publicationOpen Marxism 4
EditorsAna Cecilia DINERSTEIN, ALFONSO GARCIA VELA, EDITH GONZALEZ, JOHN HOLLOWAY
Place of PublicationLondon - New York
PublisherPluto Press
ChapterTwo
Volume4
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 28 May 2019

Cite this

Dinerstein, A. C. (Accepted/In press). A critical theory of hope: critical affirmations beyond fear. In A. C. DINERSTEIN, ALFONSO. GARCIA VELA, EDITH. GONZALEZ, & JOHN. HOLLOWAY (Eds.), Open Marxism against a closing world: Open Marxism 4 (Vol. 4). London - New York: Pluto Press.

A critical theory of hope : critical affirmations beyond fear. / Dinerstein, Ana Cecilia .

Open Marxism against a closing world: Open Marxism 4. ed. / Ana Cecilia DINERSTEIN; ALFONSO GARCIA VELA; EDITH GONZALEZ; JOHN HOLLOWAY. Vol. 4 London - New York : Pluto Press, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Dinerstein, AC 2019, A critical theory of hope: critical affirmations beyond fear. in AC DINERSTEIN, ALFONSO GARCIA VELA, EDITH GONZALEZ & JOHN HOLLOWAY (eds), Open Marxism against a closing world: Open Marxism 4. vol. 4, Pluto Press, London - New York.
Dinerstein AC. A critical theory of hope: critical affirmations beyond fear. In DINERSTEIN AC, GARCIA VELA ALFONSO, GONZALEZ EDITH, HOLLOWAY JOHN, editors, Open Marxism against a closing world: Open Marxism 4. Vol. 4. London - New York: Pluto Press. 2019
Dinerstein, Ana Cecilia . / A critical theory of hope : critical affirmations beyond fear. Open Marxism against a closing world: Open Marxism 4. editor / Ana Cecilia DINERSTEIN ; ALFONSO GARCIA VELA ; EDITH GONZALEZ ; JOHN HOLLOWAY. Vol. 4 London - New York : Pluto Press, 2019.
@inbook{41b4e2a675e3414e88f984ca58744dec,
title = "A critical theory of hope: critical affirmations beyond fear",
abstract = "Dinerstein re-evaluates the place of the theoretical and of critical theory in today’s praxis. By pointing to the sphere of social reproduction as the ‘site’ of both new forms of class struggle and the renewal of critical theory, Dinerstein argues that critical theory today should be based on Bloch’s philosophy of hope. Despite the critical theorist’s fear of the positivisation of social struggles, Dinerstein argues that the fight against Barbarism is not only possible but already exists in the form of struggles for alternative forms of life. In a context of crisis of the social reproduction, these struggles cannot not be regarded as positive: they are critical affirmations that affirm life as a form of negating a totality of destruction in a ‘contradictory’ manner (see Gun 1994). To her, while Adorno’s negative dialectics remarkably prevents dialectical closure of the capitalist totality from taking place theoretically, negative dialectics cannot open onto a ‘world with Front’ in practice. And this is what is needed today. Keywords: Adorno, critical affirmation, Bloch, concrete utopia, hope, negation, social reproduction struggles, world with a front, positivisation",
author = "Dinerstein, {Ana Cecilia}",
note = "anaceciliadinerstein.com",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "28",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
editor = "DINERSTEIN, {Ana Cecilia} and {GARCIA VELA}, ALFONSO and EDITH GONZALEZ and JOHN HOLLOWAY",
booktitle = "Open Marxism against a closing world",
publisher = "Pluto Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A critical theory of hope

T2 - critical affirmations beyond fear

AU - Dinerstein, Ana Cecilia

N1 - anaceciliadinerstein.com

PY - 2019/5/28

Y1 - 2019/5/28

N2 - Dinerstein re-evaluates the place of the theoretical and of critical theory in today’s praxis. By pointing to the sphere of social reproduction as the ‘site’ of both new forms of class struggle and the renewal of critical theory, Dinerstein argues that critical theory today should be based on Bloch’s philosophy of hope. Despite the critical theorist’s fear of the positivisation of social struggles, Dinerstein argues that the fight against Barbarism is not only possible but already exists in the form of struggles for alternative forms of life. In a context of crisis of the social reproduction, these struggles cannot not be regarded as positive: they are critical affirmations that affirm life as a form of negating a totality of destruction in a ‘contradictory’ manner (see Gun 1994). To her, while Adorno’s negative dialectics remarkably prevents dialectical closure of the capitalist totality from taking place theoretically, negative dialectics cannot open onto a ‘world with Front’ in practice. And this is what is needed today. Keywords: Adorno, critical affirmation, Bloch, concrete utopia, hope, negation, social reproduction struggles, world with a front, positivisation

AB - Dinerstein re-evaluates the place of the theoretical and of critical theory in today’s praxis. By pointing to the sphere of social reproduction as the ‘site’ of both new forms of class struggle and the renewal of critical theory, Dinerstein argues that critical theory today should be based on Bloch’s philosophy of hope. Despite the critical theorist’s fear of the positivisation of social struggles, Dinerstein argues that the fight against Barbarism is not only possible but already exists in the form of struggles for alternative forms of life. In a context of crisis of the social reproduction, these struggles cannot not be regarded as positive: they are critical affirmations that affirm life as a form of negating a totality of destruction in a ‘contradictory’ manner (see Gun 1994). To her, while Adorno’s negative dialectics remarkably prevents dialectical closure of the capitalist totality from taking place theoretically, negative dialectics cannot open onto a ‘world with Front’ in practice. And this is what is needed today. Keywords: Adorno, critical affirmation, Bloch, concrete utopia, hope, negation, social reproduction struggles, world with a front, positivisation

M3 - Chapter

VL - 4

BT - Open Marxism against a closing world

A2 - DINERSTEIN, Ana Cecilia

A2 - GARCIA VELA, ALFONSO

A2 - GONZALEZ, EDITH

A2 - HOLLOWAY, JOHN

PB - Pluto Press

CY - London - New York

ER -