Abstract
This article critically evaluates the American counterterrorism strategy of carrying out drone strikes in the tribal areas of Pakistan to enquire whether undertaking these actions could be described as a responsible policy. The analytical framework is introduced through the idea that, being a great power, the United States has a responsibility to act legally, legitimately and prudently. This framework is then applied to the current case study. The analysis concludes that it is not possible to classify the said policy as a responsible one.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-329 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Critical Studies on Terrorism |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A critical evaluation of American drone strikes in Pakistan: Legality, legitimacy and prudence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS