A course within a course: An evaluation of shared learning on a systemic foundation course for clinical psychology trainees and multidisciplinary staff

Catherine Butler, Joanne Black

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This research used a mixed-methods design to investigate the challenges and opportunities presented by running a part-time course within a full-time course: the full-time students being joined by part-time Continued Professional Development (CPD) students for their Foundation course systemic training days. A modified version of The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale was completed by students at three time points over the length of the course, and separate focus groups for full-time and part-time students held at the end of the teaching. Both groups valued the opportunities of shared learning, however, the part-time students became dissatisfied with this in the middle of the course. This dissatisfaction was due to experiences associated with being part-time students within a full-time course, as well as being a multi-disciplinary group within a uni-disciplinary group. The impact of this research in improving the course are presented, as well as general recommendations for running a course within a course.
LanguageEnglish
Pages32-36
Number of pages5
JournalContext
Issue number152
StatusPublished - Aug 2017

Fingerprint

clinical psychology
trainee
staff
evaluation
learning
student
Group
time

Keywords

  • Shared-Learning
  • Systemic
  • Foundation
  • CPD
  • multi-disciplinary
  • training

Cite this

@article{2aeac3a420fe4af1ac14a849db3a6cce,
title = "A course within a course: An evaluation of shared learning on a systemic foundation course for clinical psychology trainees and multidisciplinary staff",
abstract = "This research used a mixed-methods design to investigate the challenges and opportunities presented by running a part-time course within a full-time course: the full-time students being joined by part-time Continued Professional Development (CPD) students for their Foundation course systemic training days. A modified version of The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale was completed by students at three time points over the length of the course, and separate focus groups for full-time and part-time students held at the end of the teaching. Both groups valued the opportunities of shared learning, however, the part-time students became dissatisfied with this in the middle of the course. This dissatisfaction was due to experiences associated with being part-time students within a full-time course, as well as being a multi-disciplinary group within a uni-disciplinary group. The impact of this research in improving the course are presented, as well as general recommendations for running a course within a course.",
keywords = "Shared-Learning, Systemic, Foundation, CPD, multi-disciplinary, training",
author = "Catherine Butler and Joanne Black",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
language = "English",
pages = "32--36",
journal = "Context",
issn = "0969-1936",
number = "152",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A course within a course

T2 - Context

AU - Butler, Catherine

AU - Black, Joanne

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - This research used a mixed-methods design to investigate the challenges and opportunities presented by running a part-time course within a full-time course: the full-time students being joined by part-time Continued Professional Development (CPD) students for their Foundation course systemic training days. A modified version of The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale was completed by students at three time points over the length of the course, and separate focus groups for full-time and part-time students held at the end of the teaching. Both groups valued the opportunities of shared learning, however, the part-time students became dissatisfied with this in the middle of the course. This dissatisfaction was due to experiences associated with being part-time students within a full-time course, as well as being a multi-disciplinary group within a uni-disciplinary group. The impact of this research in improving the course are presented, as well as general recommendations for running a course within a course.

AB - This research used a mixed-methods design to investigate the challenges and opportunities presented by running a part-time course within a full-time course: the full-time students being joined by part-time Continued Professional Development (CPD) students for their Foundation course systemic training days. A modified version of The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale was completed by students at three time points over the length of the course, and separate focus groups for full-time and part-time students held at the end of the teaching. Both groups valued the opportunities of shared learning, however, the part-time students became dissatisfied with this in the middle of the course. This dissatisfaction was due to experiences associated with being part-time students within a full-time course, as well as being a multi-disciplinary group within a uni-disciplinary group. The impact of this research in improving the course are presented, as well as general recommendations for running a course within a course.

KW - Shared-Learning

KW - Systemic

KW - Foundation

KW - CPD

KW - multi-disciplinary

KW - training

M3 - Article

SP - 32

EP - 36

JO - Context

JF - Context

SN - 0969-1936

IS - 152

ER -