Abstract
Comparisons between observed and model-resolved gravity waves (GWs) are crucial for evaluating general circulation model (GCM) simulation accuracy and understanding wave characteristics. However, observational noise often obscures waves, complicating such comparisons. To address this, we have developed a GW detection method using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN is trained on Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) temperatures with labels indicating wave presence based on Berthelemy et al. (2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-455). Their method detects noise-induced pixel-to-pixel variations in horizontal wavelengths; in contrast, the CNN robustly identify waves even when applied to smoothly varying model data. Using this method, we compare stratospheric GWs in boreal winters between AIRS observations and a high-top GW-permitting GCM, Japanese Atmospheric GCM for Upper Atmosphere Research (JAGUAR). The results agree well and exhibit similar interannual variability, with discrepancies also identified, including a more zonally elongated distribution of tropical GWs in JAGUAR. This method is broadly applicable to the future use of satellites for guiding wave-resolving atmospheric model development.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e2025GL115683 |
Journal | Geophysical Research Letters |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 7 Jun 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Jun 2025 |
Data Availability Statement
The AIRS temperature retrievals (Hoffmann & Alexander, 2009) are available from https://datapub.fz-juelich.de/slcs/airs/gravity_waves (Hoffmann, 2021). The CNN, a sample code to run the CNN, and processed JAGUAR-as-AIRS data can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15382321 (Okui, 2025). Version R2022b of MATLAB was used for spectral analysis of gravity waves (https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html). Figures were produced using Python 3.10 (https://www.python.org/).Acknowledgements
The high-resolution JAGUAR simulations were performed using the Earth Simulator at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC). HO sincerely thanks Kaoru Sato and Shingo Watanabe for their valuable feedback while performing the simulations. This manuscript benefited from discussions at the International Space Science Institute in Bern as part of International Team 567.Funding
HO acknowledges support from a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Overseas Research Fellowship. PGB was supported by an URSA studentship awarded by the University of Bath and by Royal Society Grant RF\ERE\210079. CJW was supported by Royal Society Research Fellowship URF\R\221023 and NERC Grants NE/V01837X/1, NE/W003201/1, and NE/Z50399X/1. NPH was supported by NERC Grants NE/W003201/1 and NE/Z50399X/1, and NERC Fellowship NE/X017842/1.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
URSA | |
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology | |
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science | |
University of Bath | |
Natural Environment Research Council | NE/V01837X/1, NE/W003201/1, NE/X017842/1, NE/Z50399X/1 |
Royal Society | RF\ERE\210079, URF\R\221023 |
Keywords
- general circulation model
- gravity waves
- machine learning
- satellite observations
- stratosphere
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geophysics
- General Earth and Planetary Sciences