A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation

Jonathan Spiteri, Jonathan James, Michele Belot

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

We present and evaluate a new incentive-based tool to measure people’s dietary
choices in a low-cost and time effective manner. Respondents are asked to allocate
a fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with the
prospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by a
real supermarket. The tool has the advantage of offering a broad coverage of dietary
choices, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calorie, and allows the researcher to fix
the choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived from
our incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietary
intake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24
hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We invited 255 low income
participants to our laboratory and collected measures using these three alternative
tools. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a number
of biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) and
waist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weakly
correlated across the three tools. We also find that only the calorie intake measure from
our incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of these biometric
indicators. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measures
based on self-reports. We therefore argue that our tool may be useful for research
conducted with limited time and budget.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherDepartment of Economics, University of Bath
Number of pages47
StatusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameBath Economics Research Papers
PublisherDepartment of Economics, University of Bath
No.18
Volume69

Fingerprint

Food
Evaluation
Biometrics
Self-report
Costs
Questionnaire
Grocery
Inference
Nutrients
Choice sets
Low income
Supermarkets
Incentives
Body mass index

Cite this

Spiteri, J., James, J., & Belot, M. (2018). A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation. (Bath Economics Research Papers; Vol. 69, No. 18). Department of Economics, University of Bath.

A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation. / Spiteri, Jonathan; James, Jonathan; Belot, Michele.

Department of Economics, University of Bath, 2018. (Bath Economics Research Papers; Vol. 69, No. 18).

Research output: Working paper

Spiteri, J, James, J & Belot, M 2018 'A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation' Bath Economics Research Papers, no. 18, vol. 69, Department of Economics, University of Bath.
Spiteri J, James J, Belot M. A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation. Department of Economics, University of Bath. 2018. (Bath Economics Research Papers; 18).
Spiteri, Jonathan ; James, Jonathan ; Belot, Michele. / A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation. Department of Economics, University of Bath, 2018. (Bath Economics Research Papers; 18).
@techreport{c0333e17102c4ae6b55759c21467d7de,
title = "A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation",
abstract = "We present and evaluate a new incentive-based tool to measure people’s dietarychoices in a low-cost and time effective manner. Respondents are asked to allocatea fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with theprospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by areal supermarket. The tool has the advantage of offering a broad coverage of dietarychoices, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calorie, and allows the researcher to fixthe choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived fromour incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietaryintake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We invited 255 low incomeparticipants to our laboratory and collected measures using these three alternativetools. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a numberof biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) andwaist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weaklycorrelated across the three tools. We also find that only the calorie intake measure fromour incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of these biometricindicators. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measuresbased on self-reports. We therefore argue that our tool may be useful for researchconducted with limited time and budget.",
author = "Jonathan Spiteri and Jonathan James and Michele Belot",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
series = "Bath Economics Research Papers",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Bath",
number = "18",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Bath",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation

AU - Spiteri, Jonathan

AU - James, Jonathan

AU - Belot, Michele

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - We present and evaluate a new incentive-based tool to measure people’s dietarychoices in a low-cost and time effective manner. Respondents are asked to allocatea fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with theprospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by areal supermarket. The tool has the advantage of offering a broad coverage of dietarychoices, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calorie, and allows the researcher to fixthe choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived fromour incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietaryintake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We invited 255 low incomeparticipants to our laboratory and collected measures using these three alternativetools. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a numberof biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) andwaist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weaklycorrelated across the three tools. We also find that only the calorie intake measure fromour incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of these biometricindicators. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measuresbased on self-reports. We therefore argue that our tool may be useful for researchconducted with limited time and budget.

AB - We present and evaluate a new incentive-based tool to measure people’s dietarychoices in a low-cost and time effective manner. Respondents are asked to allocatea fixed monetary budget across a choice of around a hundred grocery items with theprospect of receiving these items with some probability delivered to their home by areal supermarket. The tool has the advantage of offering a broad coverage of dietarychoices, allows inference of macro-nutrients and calorie, and allows the researcher to fixthe choice set participants can choose from. We compare the information derived fromour incentivized tool, and compare it to alternative low-cost ways of measuring dietaryintake, namely the food frequency questionnaire and a one-shot version of the 24hour dietary recall, which are both based on self-reports. We invited 255 low incomeparticipants to our laboratory and collected measures using these three alternativetools. We compare the calorie intake indicators derived from each tool with a numberof biometric measures for each subject, namely weight, body-mass-index (BMI) andwaist size. The results show that the dietary information collected is only weaklycorrelated across the three tools. We also find that only the calorie intake measure fromour incentivized tool is positively and significantly related to each of these biometricindicators. By contrast, we find no significant correlations for either of the two measuresbased on self-reports. We therefore argue that our tool may be useful for researchconducted with limited time and budget.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Bath Economics Research Papers

BT - A Computer-Based Incentivized Food Basket Choice Tool: Presentation and Evaluation

PB - Department of Economics, University of Bath

ER -