Abstract
MEMS electrothermal displacement sensors can be operated in constant current (CC) or constant voltage (CV) excitation modes. The CV mode is more commonly used. However, there have been reports that the CC excitation mode may lead to a larger measured signal, and thus, it may be a better choice than the CV mode. In this letter, we present an analytic comparison of the two methods, and show that from a signal-to-noise-ratio point of view, benefits of operating a sensor in CC mode are only marginal. The analytical investigation is supported by experiments performed on sensors integrated in a SOI-MEMS nanopositioner with low noise read out circuits, which leads to 0.04 Hz displacement resolution for both excitation modes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 6787062 |
Pages (from-to) | 584-586 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | IEEE Electron Device Letters |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Apr 2014 |
Keywords
- electrothermal sensor
- Micro-electromechancial systems (MEMS)
- noise.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of two excitation modes for MEMS electrothermal displacement sensors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Ali Mohammadi
- Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering - Senior Lecturer
- Electronics Materials, Circuits & Systems Research Unit (EMaCS)
- Centre for Digital, Manufacturing & Design (dMaDe)
- Centre for Bioengineering & Biomedical Technologies (CBio)
- Bath Institute for the Augmented Human
Person: Research & Teaching, Core staff, Affiliate staff