A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints

Christopher Lusty, Nicola Bailey, Patrick Keogh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Hinged joints are ubiquitous in machine and mechanism design where components must rotate relative to one another. Their simplicity and reliability, coupled with limited alternatives, make them an obvious choice. However, the propensity of such joints to exhibit unpredictable discontinuities in their operation can limit the precision with which a mechanism incorporating such a joint can be controlled. In particular, almost all hinged joints experience some degree of both backlash and stiction. An alternative to hinged joints in many applications may be the use of large-displacement flexure-link joints. The use of flexure joints in micro-mechanisms is already an established practice, but their use in joints with large angular displacements (e.g. 30 degrees) is far less common. Such joints are inherently non-linear, and introduce more complex motion than simple hinges, but they offer the considerable advantage of highly predictable behaviour, without the exhibition of discontinuities. These characteristics open the way to increased mechanism precision and repeatability, and consequent new possibilities in machine design. This work makes a comparison of the precision which can be achieved when controlling similar mechanisms employing each of i) a realistic hinged joint, and ii) a large-displacement flexure-link joint. The modeling techniques used to represent each mechanism are discussed, and a series of results are presented illustrating the performance and prospects for precision motion of each system.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
Place of PublicationTampa, Florida
Number of pages8
VolumeVolume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Stiction
Machine design
Motion control
Hinges

Cite this

Lusty, C., Bailey, N., & Keogh, P. (2017). A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints. In Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. Volume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control). [IMECE2017-71350] Tampa, Florida. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2017-71350

A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints. / Lusty, Christopher; Bailey, Nicola; Keogh, Patrick.

Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Vol. Volume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control Tampa, Florida, 2017. IMECE2017-71350.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Lusty, C, Bailey, N & Keogh, P 2017, A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints. in Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. vol. Volume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control, IMECE2017-71350, Tampa, Florida. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2017-71350
Lusty C, Bailey N, Keogh P. A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints. In Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Vol. Volume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control. Tampa, Florida. 2017. IMECE2017-71350 https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2017-71350
Lusty, Christopher ; Bailey, Nicola ; Keogh, Patrick. / A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints. Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Vol. Volume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control Tampa, Florida, 2017.
@inproceedings{7c5068ae8ef4415bb6c7de4c8c85854a,
title = "A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints",
abstract = "Hinged joints are ubiquitous in machine and mechanism design where components must rotate relative to one another. Their simplicity and reliability, coupled with limited alternatives, make them an obvious choice. However, the propensity of such joints to exhibit unpredictable discontinuities in their operation can limit the precision with which a mechanism incorporating such a joint can be controlled. In particular, almost all hinged joints experience some degree of both backlash and stiction. An alternative to hinged joints in many applications may be the use of large-displacement flexure-link joints. The use of flexure joints in micro-mechanisms is already an established practice, but their use in joints with large angular displacements (e.g. 30 degrees) is far less common. Such joints are inherently non-linear, and introduce more complex motion than simple hinges, but they offer the considerable advantage of highly predictable behaviour, without the exhibition of discontinuities. These characteristics open the way to increased mechanism precision and repeatability, and consequent new possibilities in machine design. This work makes a comparison of the precision which can be achieved when controlling similar mechanisms employing each of i) a realistic hinged joint, and ii) a large-displacement flexure-link joint. The modeling techniques used to represent each mechanism are discussed, and a series of results are presented illustrating the performance and prospects for precision motion of each system.",
author = "Christopher Lusty and Nicola Bailey and Patrick Keogh",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1115/IMECE2017-71350",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-7918-5837-0",
volume = "Volume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of the capacity for precise motion control between hinged joints and flexure joints

AU - Lusty, Christopher

AU - Bailey, Nicola

AU - Keogh, Patrick

PY - 2017/11/3

Y1 - 2017/11/3

N2 - Hinged joints are ubiquitous in machine and mechanism design where components must rotate relative to one another. Their simplicity and reliability, coupled with limited alternatives, make them an obvious choice. However, the propensity of such joints to exhibit unpredictable discontinuities in their operation can limit the precision with which a mechanism incorporating such a joint can be controlled. In particular, almost all hinged joints experience some degree of both backlash and stiction. An alternative to hinged joints in many applications may be the use of large-displacement flexure-link joints. The use of flexure joints in micro-mechanisms is already an established practice, but their use in joints with large angular displacements (e.g. 30 degrees) is far less common. Such joints are inherently non-linear, and introduce more complex motion than simple hinges, but they offer the considerable advantage of highly predictable behaviour, without the exhibition of discontinuities. These characteristics open the way to increased mechanism precision and repeatability, and consequent new possibilities in machine design. This work makes a comparison of the precision which can be achieved when controlling similar mechanisms employing each of i) a realistic hinged joint, and ii) a large-displacement flexure-link joint. The modeling techniques used to represent each mechanism are discussed, and a series of results are presented illustrating the performance and prospects for precision motion of each system.

AB - Hinged joints are ubiquitous in machine and mechanism design where components must rotate relative to one another. Their simplicity and reliability, coupled with limited alternatives, make them an obvious choice. However, the propensity of such joints to exhibit unpredictable discontinuities in their operation can limit the precision with which a mechanism incorporating such a joint can be controlled. In particular, almost all hinged joints experience some degree of both backlash and stiction. An alternative to hinged joints in many applications may be the use of large-displacement flexure-link joints. The use of flexure joints in micro-mechanisms is already an established practice, but their use in joints with large angular displacements (e.g. 30 degrees) is far less common. Such joints are inherently non-linear, and introduce more complex motion than simple hinges, but they offer the considerable advantage of highly predictable behaviour, without the exhibition of discontinuities. These characteristics open the way to increased mechanism precision and repeatability, and consequent new possibilities in machine design. This work makes a comparison of the precision which can be achieved when controlling similar mechanisms employing each of i) a realistic hinged joint, and ii) a large-displacement flexure-link joint. The modeling techniques used to represent each mechanism are discussed, and a series of results are presented illustrating the performance and prospects for precision motion of each system.

U2 - 10.1115/IMECE2017-71350

DO - 10.1115/IMECE2017-71350

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-0-7918-5837-0

VL - Volume 4A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control

BT - Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition

CY - Tampa, Florida

ER -