A comparison of prism adaptation with terminal versus concurrent exposure on sensorimotor changes and spatial neglect

Alessio Facchin, Janet H. Bultitude, Giulia Mornati, Milena Peverelli, Roberta Daini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Prism adaptation (PA) is a technique that induces a temporary change of the alignment between different reference frames. This technique has been shown to reduce many signs of unilateral spatial neglect (USN). Two procedures of prism adaptation have been used. In concurrent exposure participants can see their arm and hand during the movement trajectory, and during terminal exposure, participants can see only the most distal few centimetres. Because the two exposures elicit different proportions of visual and proprioceptive realignment, they could present different rehabilitation efficacies. We compared these procedures in 12 USN patients and 12 healthy participants who performed one session of PA with concurrent exposure and one session with terminal exposure. We compared the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor outcomes (visual subjective straight ahead, proprioceptive subjective straight ahead, open loop pointing, and error correction during exposure) and neglect outcomes. We found no significant differences in the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor performance of patients and controls, nor on patients’ neuropsychological outcomes. Compared with controls, USN patients showed a significant rightward bias in visual subjective straight ahead pre-adaptation, a slower rate of error correction during prism exposure, and some evidence that visual and proprioceptive shift could be influenced by their neglect. Based on these results, we recommend that prism adaptation be conducted with concurrent exposure for easiness of execution.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-28
Number of pages28
JournalNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
Early online date18 Jun 2018
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Healthy Volunteers
Arm
Rehabilitation
Hand
Neglect
Sensorimotor
Error Correction
Distal
Realignment
Frame of Reference
Efficacy
Trajectory
Proportion
Alignment

Cite this

A comparison of prism adaptation with terminal versus concurrent exposure on sensorimotor changes and spatial neglect. / Facchin, Alessio; Bultitude, Janet H.; Mornati, Giulia; Peverelli, Milena; Daini, Roberta.

In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18.06.2018, p. 1-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e097550782f4e1e8d487fb473482141,
title = "A comparison of prism adaptation with terminal versus concurrent exposure on sensorimotor changes and spatial neglect",
abstract = "Prism adaptation (PA) is a technique that induces a temporary change of the alignment between different reference frames. This technique has been shown to reduce many signs of unilateral spatial neglect (USN). Two procedures of prism adaptation have been used. In concurrent exposure participants can see their arm and hand during the movement trajectory, and during terminal exposure, participants can see only the most distal few centimetres. Because the two exposures elicit different proportions of visual and proprioceptive realignment, they could present different rehabilitation efficacies. We compared these procedures in 12 USN patients and 12 healthy participants who performed one session of PA with concurrent exposure and one session with terminal exposure. We compared the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor outcomes (visual subjective straight ahead, proprioceptive subjective straight ahead, open loop pointing, and error correction during exposure) and neglect outcomes. We found no significant differences in the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor performance of patients and controls, nor on patients’ neuropsychological outcomes. Compared with controls, USN patients showed a significant rightward bias in visual subjective straight ahead pre-adaptation, a slower rate of error correction during prism exposure, and some evidence that visual and proprioceptive shift could be influenced by their neglect. Based on these results, we recommend that prism adaptation be conducted with concurrent exposure for easiness of execution.",
author = "Alessio Facchin and Bultitude, {Janet H.} and Giulia Mornati and Milena Peverelli and Roberta Daini",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/09602011.2018.1484374",
language = "English",
pages = "1--28",
journal = "Neuropsychological Rehabilitation",
issn = "0960-2011",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of prism adaptation with terminal versus concurrent exposure on sensorimotor changes and spatial neglect

AU - Facchin, Alessio

AU - Bultitude, Janet H.

AU - Mornati, Giulia

AU - Peverelli, Milena

AU - Daini, Roberta

PY - 2018/6/18

Y1 - 2018/6/18

N2 - Prism adaptation (PA) is a technique that induces a temporary change of the alignment between different reference frames. This technique has been shown to reduce many signs of unilateral spatial neglect (USN). Two procedures of prism adaptation have been used. In concurrent exposure participants can see their arm and hand during the movement trajectory, and during terminal exposure, participants can see only the most distal few centimetres. Because the two exposures elicit different proportions of visual and proprioceptive realignment, they could present different rehabilitation efficacies. We compared these procedures in 12 USN patients and 12 healthy participants who performed one session of PA with concurrent exposure and one session with terminal exposure. We compared the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor outcomes (visual subjective straight ahead, proprioceptive subjective straight ahead, open loop pointing, and error correction during exposure) and neglect outcomes. We found no significant differences in the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor performance of patients and controls, nor on patients’ neuropsychological outcomes. Compared with controls, USN patients showed a significant rightward bias in visual subjective straight ahead pre-adaptation, a slower rate of error correction during prism exposure, and some evidence that visual and proprioceptive shift could be influenced by their neglect. Based on these results, we recommend that prism adaptation be conducted with concurrent exposure for easiness of execution.

AB - Prism adaptation (PA) is a technique that induces a temporary change of the alignment between different reference frames. This technique has been shown to reduce many signs of unilateral spatial neglect (USN). Two procedures of prism adaptation have been used. In concurrent exposure participants can see their arm and hand during the movement trajectory, and during terminal exposure, participants can see only the most distal few centimetres. Because the two exposures elicit different proportions of visual and proprioceptive realignment, they could present different rehabilitation efficacies. We compared these procedures in 12 USN patients and 12 healthy participants who performed one session of PA with concurrent exposure and one session with terminal exposure. We compared the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor outcomes (visual subjective straight ahead, proprioceptive subjective straight ahead, open loop pointing, and error correction during exposure) and neglect outcomes. We found no significant differences in the effects of the two exposure types on sensorimotor performance of patients and controls, nor on patients’ neuropsychological outcomes. Compared with controls, USN patients showed a significant rightward bias in visual subjective straight ahead pre-adaptation, a slower rate of error correction during prism exposure, and some evidence that visual and proprioceptive shift could be influenced by their neglect. Based on these results, we recommend that prism adaptation be conducted with concurrent exposure for easiness of execution.

U2 - 10.1080/09602011.2018.1484374

DO - 10.1080/09602011.2018.1484374

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

T2 - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

SN - 0960-2011

ER -