A comparison of GP, pharmacist and nurse prescriber responses to patients' emotional cues and concerns in primary care consultations

Ruth Riley, Marjorie Cecilia Weiss, Jo Platt, Gordon Taylor, Susan Horrocks, Andrea Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
144 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Recognising patients' cues and concerns is an important part of patient centred care. With nurses and pharmacists now able to prescribe in the UK, this study compared the frequency, nature, and professionals' responses to patient cues and concerns in consultations with GPs, nurse prescribers and pharmacist prescribers.

Methods: Audio-recording and analysis of primary care consultations in England between patients and nurse prescribers, pharmacist prescribers and GPs. Recordings were coded for the number of cues and concerns raised, cue or concern type and whether responded to positively or missed.

Results: A total of 528 consultations were audio-recorded with 51 professionals: 20 GPs, 19 nurse prescribers and 12 pharmacist prescribers. Overall there were 3.5 cues or concerns per consultation, with no difference between prescriber groups. Pharmacist prescribers responded positively to 81% of patient's cues and concerns with nurse prescribers responding positively to 72% and GPs 53% (PhP v NP: U = 7453, z = -2.1, p = 0.04; PhP v GP: U = 5463, z = -5.9, p < 0.0001; NP v GP: U = 12,070, z = -4.9, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: This evidence suggests that pharmacists and nurses are responding supportively to patients' cues and concerns. Practice implications: The findings support the importance of patient-centredness in training new prescribers and their potential in providing public health roles.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-71
Number of pages7
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume91
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Pharmacists
Cues
Primary Health Care
Referral and Consultation
Nurses
Patient-Centered Care
England
Public Health

Keywords

  • Patient-provider communication
  • concern
  • cues

Cite this

A comparison of GP, pharmacist and nurse prescriber responses to patients' emotional cues and concerns in primary care consultations. / Riley, Ruth; Weiss, Marjorie Cecilia; Platt, Jo; Taylor, Gordon; Horrocks, Susan; Taylor, Andrea.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 91, No. 1, 04.2012, p. 65-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riley, Ruth ; Weiss, Marjorie Cecilia ; Platt, Jo ; Taylor, Gordon ; Horrocks, Susan ; Taylor, Andrea. / A comparison of GP, pharmacist and nurse prescriber responses to patients' emotional cues and concerns in primary care consultations. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2012 ; Vol. 91, No. 1. pp. 65-71.
@article{321b40a5966e4ecf84d38b3e9104b703,
title = "A comparison of GP, pharmacist and nurse prescriber responses to patients' emotional cues and concerns in primary care consultations",
abstract = "Objective: Recognising patients' cues and concerns is an important part of patient centred care. With nurses and pharmacists now able to prescribe in the UK, this study compared the frequency, nature, and professionals' responses to patient cues and concerns in consultations with GPs, nurse prescribers and pharmacist prescribers. Methods: Audio-recording and analysis of primary care consultations in England between patients and nurse prescribers, pharmacist prescribers and GPs. Recordings were coded for the number of cues and concerns raised, cue or concern type and whether responded to positively or missed. Results: A total of 528 consultations were audio-recorded with 51 professionals: 20 GPs, 19 nurse prescribers and 12 pharmacist prescribers. Overall there were 3.5 cues or concerns per consultation, with no difference between prescriber groups. Pharmacist prescribers responded positively to 81{\%} of patient's cues and concerns with nurse prescribers responding positively to 72{\%} and GPs 53{\%} (PhP v NP: U = 7453, z = -2.1, p = 0.04; PhP v GP: U = 5463, z = -5.9, p < 0.0001; NP v GP: U = 12,070, z = -4.9, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This evidence suggests that pharmacists and nurses are responding supportively to patients' cues and concerns. Practice implications: The findings support the importance of patient-centredness in training new prescribers and their potential in providing public health roles.",
keywords = "Patient-provider communication, concern, cues",
author = "Ruth Riley and Weiss, {Marjorie Cecilia} and Jo Platt and Gordon Taylor and Susan Horrocks and Andrea Taylor",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.009",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "65--71",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of GP, pharmacist and nurse prescriber responses to patients' emotional cues and concerns in primary care consultations

AU - Riley, Ruth

AU - Weiss, Marjorie Cecilia

AU - Platt, Jo

AU - Taylor, Gordon

AU - Horrocks, Susan

AU - Taylor, Andrea

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Objective: Recognising patients' cues and concerns is an important part of patient centred care. With nurses and pharmacists now able to prescribe in the UK, this study compared the frequency, nature, and professionals' responses to patient cues and concerns in consultations with GPs, nurse prescribers and pharmacist prescribers. Methods: Audio-recording and analysis of primary care consultations in England between patients and nurse prescribers, pharmacist prescribers and GPs. Recordings were coded for the number of cues and concerns raised, cue or concern type and whether responded to positively or missed. Results: A total of 528 consultations were audio-recorded with 51 professionals: 20 GPs, 19 nurse prescribers and 12 pharmacist prescribers. Overall there were 3.5 cues or concerns per consultation, with no difference between prescriber groups. Pharmacist prescribers responded positively to 81% of patient's cues and concerns with nurse prescribers responding positively to 72% and GPs 53% (PhP v NP: U = 7453, z = -2.1, p = 0.04; PhP v GP: U = 5463, z = -5.9, p < 0.0001; NP v GP: U = 12,070, z = -4.9, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This evidence suggests that pharmacists and nurses are responding supportively to patients' cues and concerns. Practice implications: The findings support the importance of patient-centredness in training new prescribers and their potential in providing public health roles.

AB - Objective: Recognising patients' cues and concerns is an important part of patient centred care. With nurses and pharmacists now able to prescribe in the UK, this study compared the frequency, nature, and professionals' responses to patient cues and concerns in consultations with GPs, nurse prescribers and pharmacist prescribers. Methods: Audio-recording and analysis of primary care consultations in England between patients and nurse prescribers, pharmacist prescribers and GPs. Recordings were coded for the number of cues and concerns raised, cue or concern type and whether responded to positively or missed. Results: A total of 528 consultations were audio-recorded with 51 professionals: 20 GPs, 19 nurse prescribers and 12 pharmacist prescribers. Overall there were 3.5 cues or concerns per consultation, with no difference between prescriber groups. Pharmacist prescribers responded positively to 81% of patient's cues and concerns with nurse prescribers responding positively to 72% and GPs 53% (PhP v NP: U = 7453, z = -2.1, p = 0.04; PhP v GP: U = 5463, z = -5.9, p < 0.0001; NP v GP: U = 12,070, z = -4.9, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This evidence suggests that pharmacists and nurses are responding supportively to patients' cues and concerns. Practice implications: The findings support the importance of patient-centredness in training new prescribers and their potential in providing public health roles.

KW - Patient-provider communication

KW - concern

KW - cues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875378771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.009

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.009

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 65

EP - 71

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -