A comparison of designer activity using core design situations in the laboratory and practice

P.J. Cash, B.J. Hicks, S.J. Culley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2011 one quarter of all articles published in Design Studies and the Journal of Engineering Design used experimental studies. However, there is little work exploring the relationship between laboratory and practice. This paper addresses this by detailing an analysis of designer activity in three situations commonly studied by design researchers: information seeking, ideation and design review. This comparison is instantiated through three complementary studies: an observational study of practice and two experimental studies. These reveal a range of similarities and differences that are described using a mixed methods approach. Based on this it is concluded that laboratory studies are important research tools and that clear and definable relationships do exist between design activity in practice and the laboratory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-611
Number of pages37
JournalDesign Studies
Volume34
Issue number5
Early online date24 Apr 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Design of experiments
engineering
Designer
Experimental Study
Information Seeking
Observational Study
Laboratory Studies
Engineering Design
Mixed Methods
Information Design

Cite this

A comparison of designer activity using core design situations in the laboratory and practice. / Cash, P.J.; Hicks, B.J.; Culley, S.J.

In: Design Studies, Vol. 34, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 575-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2b86dee4868244959d1c910cad6006f3,
title = "A comparison of designer activity using core design situations in the laboratory and practice",
abstract = "In 2011 one quarter of all articles published in Design Studies and the Journal of Engineering Design used experimental studies. However, there is little work exploring the relationship between laboratory and practice. This paper addresses this by detailing an analysis of designer activity in three situations commonly studied by design researchers: information seeking, ideation and design review. This comparison is instantiated through three complementary studies: an observational study of practice and two experimental studies. These reveal a range of similarities and differences that are described using a mixed methods approach. Based on this it is concluded that laboratory studies are important research tools and that clear and definable relationships do exist between design activity in practice and the laboratory.",
author = "P.J. Cash and B.J. Hicks and S.J. Culley",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "575--611",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of designer activity using core design situations in the laboratory and practice

AU - Cash, P.J.

AU - Hicks, B.J.

AU - Culley, S.J.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - In 2011 one quarter of all articles published in Design Studies and the Journal of Engineering Design used experimental studies. However, there is little work exploring the relationship between laboratory and practice. This paper addresses this by detailing an analysis of designer activity in three situations commonly studied by design researchers: information seeking, ideation and design review. This comparison is instantiated through three complementary studies: an observational study of practice and two experimental studies. These reveal a range of similarities and differences that are described using a mixed methods approach. Based on this it is concluded that laboratory studies are important research tools and that clear and definable relationships do exist between design activity in practice and the laboratory.

AB - In 2011 one quarter of all articles published in Design Studies and the Journal of Engineering Design used experimental studies. However, there is little work exploring the relationship between laboratory and practice. This paper addresses this by detailing an analysis of designer activity in three situations commonly studied by design researchers: information seeking, ideation and design review. This comparison is instantiated through three complementary studies: an observational study of practice and two experimental studies. These reveal a range of similarities and differences that are described using a mixed methods approach. Based on this it is concluded that laboratory studies are important research tools and that clear and definable relationships do exist between design activity in practice and the laboratory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876395614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.002

U2 - 10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.002

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 575

EP - 611

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

IS - 5

ER -